2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2015.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Structural Connectivity in Late-Life Major Depressive Disorder

Abstract: Disrupted brain connectivity might explain both the pathogenesis and consequences of late-life major depressive disorder (LLD). However, it remains difficult to ascertain whether and how specific circuits are affected. We reviewed literature regarding brain connectivity in LLD, and we specifically focused on the role of structural pathology. LLD is associated with greater levels of cerebrovascular disease, and greater levels of cerebrovascular disease are associated with both depression development and treatme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, our findings (regarding the factors that attenuated the white matter-caregiving strain association) can be interpreted within the context of existing literature and current conceptual frameworks. Depression, a known consequence of strain in caregivers (4, 10), is often conceptualized as a consequence of white matter disease (11-13). Depression symptoms attenuated the association of interest, potentially because depression is an intermediate (mediator) between white matter pathology and caregiving strain, or a downstream consequence of caregiving strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, our findings (regarding the factors that attenuated the white matter-caregiving strain association) can be interpreted within the context of existing literature and current conceptual frameworks. Depression, a known consequence of strain in caregivers (4, 10), is often conceptualized as a consequence of white matter disease (11-13). Depression symptoms attenuated the association of interest, potentially because depression is an intermediate (mediator) between white matter pathology and caregiving strain, or a downstream consequence of caregiving strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the core of late-life depression's putative pathophysiological mechanisms is brain structural pathology affecting connectivity (for a recent review, see (11)). In 1997, the ‘vascular depression’ hypothesis was forwarded, positing that cerebrovascular pathology affecting white matter may “predispose, precipitate, or perpetuate a depressive syndrome in many elderly patients” (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since LLD is associated with pathology affecting both white and grey matter (Smagula and Aizenstein, 2015), brain structural pathology is likely to be a key driver of LLD’s consequences. Indeed, cerebrovascular disease is well-recognized as a potential contributor to LLD’s consequences (Alexopoulos et al, 1997); for example, evidence shows that LLD patients with a greater burden of cerebrovascular disease (measured by white matter hyperintensities volume (WMH)) are at increased risk for dementia (Steffens et al, 2007) and death (Levy et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accumulated evidence from structural neuroimaging studies suggests that patients with later-life depression (LLD) show abnormal gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) brain structures. Patients with LLD have a significantly smaller GM volume in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), superior temporal gyrus (STG), middle temporal gyrus, inferior frontal, orbitofrontal cortex, insula, hippocampus, amygdala and putamen than healthy individuals (Andreescu et al, 2008 ; Sexton et al, 2013 ; Du et al, 2014 ; Smagula and Aizenstein, 2016 ). In terms of WM structures, patients with LLD showed abnormal connectivity in the cingulum, uncinate fasciculus (Charlton et al, 2015 ), temporal lobe (Charlton et al, 2015 ), superior longitudinal fasciculus, superior frontal gyrus, corpus callosum (Reppermund et al, 2014 ) and parahippocampal gyrus (Guo et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%