2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.721206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Structural and Functional Connectivity: A Review of Combined Works of Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Electro-Encephalography

Abstract: Implications of structural connections within and between brain regions for their functional counterpart are timely points of discussion. White matter microstructural organization and functional activity can be assessed in unison. At first glance, however, the corresponding findings appear variable, both in the healthy brain and in numerous neuro-pathologies. To identify consistent associations between structural and functional connectivity and possible impacts for the clinic, we reviewed the literature of com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 197 publications
(270 reference statements)
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our testing results complement other detection methods based on fMRI and clinical factors 54,56,57 . The GGN approach helps brain specialists to detect early seizure attacks with more accurate results.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our testing results complement other detection methods based on fMRI and clinical factors 54,56,57 . The GGN approach helps brain specialists to detect early seizure attacks with more accurate results.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…In addition to detection or classification tasks, brain functional connectivity has been a very hot research topic for many years 54 . Revealing accurate connectivity within very small-time windows is critical to modeling the brain activity associated with neurological disorders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, there are multiple studies reporting altered subcortical-to-cortical connectivity in SZ and BPI, but these are typically reported across thalamocortical connections ( Sui et al, 2011 ). Previous work in a large-scale multi-site study noted alterations in similar networks in individuals on the schizophrenia portion of the psychotic spectrum ( Skåtun et al, 2017 ) and it has been argued by multiple research groups that individuals with schizophrenia may display alterations within the striatal-thalamo-cortical loop ( Sui et al, 2011 , Skåtun et al, 2017 , Sui et al, 2015 , Sui et al, 2018 , Ellison-Wright and Bullmore, 2009 , Skudlarski et al, 2013 , Heng et al, 2010 , Babaeeghazvini et al, 2021 ). This loop is a key mechanism in inhibitory control, which has been proposed to interplay with working memory ( Lustig et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the inattentive and hyperactive clusters were not found to differ on any behavioural measures could be attributable to the fact that functional connectivity is typically better-associated with behaviour than structural connectivity (Jia et al, 2014; Fjell et al, 2017). In addition, structural brain connectivity has been linked robustly to cognitive ability (Ponsoda et al, 2017; Babaeeghazvini et al, 2021; Amunts et al, 2022). This coupling of structure-cognition and function-behaviour relationships could explain why cognitive differences, rather than behavioural differences, were found to exist between two different profiles of structural brain connectivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%