2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10890-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain structural abnormalities in the preclinical stage of Machado–Joseph disease/spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (MJD/SCA3): evaluation by MRI morphometry, diffusion tensor imaging and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, to assess regional mature (myelinating) oligodendrocyte impairments in SCA3 patient tissue, we assessed myelination using a Luxol Fast Blue stain in cerebellar and cortical tissue from SCA3 and control post-mortem subjects ( Figures 1A, B and Supplementary Figure 1 ). Consistent with MRI studies assessing white matter changes ( Kang et al, 2014 ; Arruda et al, 2020 ; Park et al, 2020 ; Piccinin et al, 2020 ; Li et al, 2022 ), we discovered reduced cerebellar myelin staining in SCA3 patient brains relative to controls ( Figure 1A ). In contrast, we found similar myelin staining between SCA3 patients and control subjects in the frontal cortex ( Figure 1B ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, to assess regional mature (myelinating) oligodendrocyte impairments in SCA3 patient tissue, we assessed myelination using a Luxol Fast Blue stain in cerebellar and cortical tissue from SCA3 and control post-mortem subjects ( Figures 1A, B and Supplementary Figure 1 ). Consistent with MRI studies assessing white matter changes ( Kang et al, 2014 ; Arruda et al, 2020 ; Park et al, 2020 ; Piccinin et al, 2020 ; Li et al, 2022 ), we discovered reduced cerebellar myelin staining in SCA3 patient brains relative to controls ( Figure 1A ). In contrast, we found similar myelin staining between SCA3 patients and control subjects in the frontal cortex ( Figure 1B ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Here, we extend our foundational studies to relate SCA3 phenotypic and regional vulnerability to the onset and progression of disease-associated oligodendrocyte signatures in both Knock-In and overexpression mouse models of SCA3 ( Figure 5 ). In line with SCA3 patient imaging of white matter changes ( Kang et al, 2014 ; Li et al, 2022 ), we observed transcriptional dysregulation of oligodendrocyte maturation in SCA3 mice first in brain regions most vulnerable to SCA3, including the brainstem and spinal cord, followed by the cerebellum, with little to no changes in the forebrain. More detailed regional histological assessment revealed the SCA3 vulnerable DCN within the cerebellum is in fact similarly affected by oligodendrocyte maturation impairments as the pons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result reflects cerebral‐cerebellar connectivity disruption, which is also found in other types of ataxia. 24 , 48 , 49 A recent neuroimage study 12 , 50 in preclinical SCA3/MJD patients reported white matter fiber damage in the bilateral cerebellar peduncles and cerebellum. As a bridge between the cerebellum and other brain areas, the WM fiber damage in cerebellum peduncles decreases the structural connectivity between the cerebellum, thalamus, and base ganglia, which may lead to a change in the motor network of patients with preclinical SCA3/MJD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the correlation between CAG repeat number and imaging parameters, previous studies had controversial findings. A study identified the relationship between the CAG repeat length and brain microstructural alterations of preclinical SCA3 58 , while several studies found no significant correlation between DTI parameters and CAG repeat number 10,11 . Our results supported that the CAG repeat number may intensify white matter damage of cerebellum in SCA3 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%