1991
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.11-03-00701.1991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain-specific polyA- transcripts are detected in polyA+ RNA: do complex polyA- brain RNAs really exist?

Abstract: Transcripts encoded by 2 different rat genomic clones, rg13 and rg100, appear to be typical brain-specific polyA- RNAs, as defined by previous criteria (rare, polysomal, and postnatally expressed from single-copy genes). However, we have found by using a sensitive nuclease protection assay that low levels of these transcripts (10% and 3%, respectively) are detected in polyA+ RNA. To determine if rg transcripts that fractionate as polyA- could have resulted from nicking of polyA+ RNA, we assessed the integrity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RNase protections were performed as described by Fung et al (1991Fung et al ( , 1992 with some minor modifications. The RNase protection probe was constructed as follows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RNase protections were performed as described by Fung et al (1991Fung et al ( , 1992 with some minor modifications. The RNase protection probe was constructed as follows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, nonpolyadenylated brain mRNA is probably biologically significant (Kaufmann et al, 1977;Chikaraishi et al, 1978;Morrison et al, 1979;Chikaraishi, 1979;Hahn et al, 1983). Some poly(A) Ϫ RNA may derive from poly(A) ϩ RNA by breakage during isolation (Fung et al, 1991); however, it is unlikely that Girk2D derives by random breakage since that would be expected to result in a smear on Northern blots. Also, the CNS specificity of Girk2D indicates that it probably is not generated by a random process.…”
Section: Fig 6 Expression In Testismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclease protection experiments were performed as described (Fung et al, 1991). The nuclease protection probe was constructed as follows: the XbaI/EcoRI fragment of -773 TH CAT (-364 to f274, encompassing the TH initiation site at + 1, TH sequences to +27, and 247 NT of CAT sequence) was subcloned into pGEM-1, and linearized at -109 with Bsu36I.…”
Section: Nuclease Protection Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%