2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2017.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain-shift compensation using intraoperative ultrasound and constraint-based biomechanical simulation

Abstract: In this paper, a new constraint-based biomechanical simulation method is proposed to compensate for craniotomy-induced brain-shift. While being efficient to correct this deformation, the method is fully integrable in a clinical process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(122 reference statements)
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The blank spaces represent a lack of information. References for brain (Gunawan et al, 2015;Kaster et al, 2011;Law et al, 1985;Liu et al, 2017;Morin et al, 2017;Pinton et al, 2011) for liver Civale et al, 2013;Degos et al, 2010;Freese & Lyons, 1977;Ito et al, 2017;Law et al, 1985;Liu et al, 2006;Palabiyik et al, 2017;Tzschatzsch et al, 2016;Wear et al, 1995) and for kidney (Gennisson et al, 2012;Grenier, Gennisson et al, 2013;Insana et al, 1992;Palabiyik et al, 2017) 2-6, 2-7, 2-8, and 2-9. .............................................................................................53 Table 2-7.…”
Section: List Of Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blank spaces represent a lack of information. References for brain (Gunawan et al, 2015;Kaster et al, 2011;Law et al, 1985;Liu et al, 2017;Morin et al, 2017;Pinton et al, 2011) for liver Civale et al, 2013;Degos et al, 2010;Freese & Lyons, 1977;Ito et al, 2017;Law et al, 1985;Liu et al, 2006;Palabiyik et al, 2017;Tzschatzsch et al, 2016;Wear et al, 1995) and for kidney (Gennisson et al, 2012;Grenier, Gennisson et al, 2013;Insana et al, 1992;Palabiyik et al, 2017) 2-6, 2-7, 2-8, and 2-9. .............................................................................................53 Table 2-7.…”
Section: List Of Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods cited above perform the registration prescribing displacements which significantly reduces the importance of both mechanical parameters and boundary conditions of biomechanical models in the neighborhood of image's data . Yet, in areas where no data are available, models plays the role of a regularisation term between image‐based constraints .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since trueq˙t+h and q t + h are unknown, the non‐linear problem defined in Equation is linearised (equivalent to a first order Taylor expansion). Assuming that no constraints λ are applied at the beginning of each simulation step t (i.e., λ t = 0 , see Morin et al for details) it gives []1hboldM+hscriptFboldqtrue|boldqtfalse(boldqt+hboldqtfalse)=scriptFfalse(boldqtfalse). …”
Section: Constraint‐based Registration Of Biomechanical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section summarizes key steps and modeling choices that could or should be taken into account before and during surgery. In the following section we will position our retrospective study [8] with respect to these criteria, and highlight the necessary steps that are still missing for intra-operative usage of the method. Table 1: Key steps for computational modeling in the operating theater.…”
Section: Key Steps For Computational Modeling In the Operating Theatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In section 2 we will introduce the main steps and criteria of model-based registration approaches. Section 3 is dedicated to the presentation of our method [8], which relies on Finite Element modeling and vessels-based constraints from intra-operative US. We then provide detailed discussion and comparison regarding the criteria introduced previously as well as the constraints in the operating theater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%