1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1996.tb01580.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Rhythms of Language: Nouns Versus Verbs

Abstract: Electrocortical activity was recorded from scalps of human subjects reading nouns and verbs. Current source density analysis of EEG signals and calculation of spectral responses revealed differences between word categories in the 30 Hz range. Verbs elicited stronger 30 Hz activity at recording sites over the motor cortices, while nouns elicited stronger responses at sites over visual cortices in the occipital lobes. Behavioural testing indicated that, at the cognitive level, this double dissociation correspond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
39
1
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(26 reference statements)
10
39
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings were supported by brain imaging studies with healthy participants, which reported on different functional processes and/or distinct functional networks involved in processing different word types. In correspondence with the findings in patients, healthy subjects also show different brain activation for nouns and verbs (e.g., Pulvermueller, Preissl, Lutzenberger, & Birbaumer, 1996Warburton et al, 1996), concrete and abstract nouns (e.g., Kiehl et al, 1999;West & Holcomb, 2000), proper names and common nouns (e.g., Mueller & Kutas, 1996) and even subgroups of verbs (Pulvermueller et al, 2001;Weiss, Berghoff, Rappelsberger, & Mueller, 2001a).…”
Section: Word Processingsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…These findings were supported by brain imaging studies with healthy participants, which reported on different functional processes and/or distinct functional networks involved in processing different word types. In correspondence with the findings in patients, healthy subjects also show different brain activation for nouns and verbs (e.g., Pulvermueller, Preissl, Lutzenberger, & Birbaumer, 1996Warburton et al, 1996), concrete and abstract nouns (e.g., Kiehl et al, 1999;West & Holcomb, 2000), proper names and common nouns (e.g., Mueller & Kutas, 1996) and even subgroups of verbs (Pulvermueller et al, 2001;Weiss, Berghoff, Rappelsberger, & Mueller, 2001a).…”
Section: Word Processingsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Dehaene (1995), using a semantic categorization task, found distributional differences among word categories around 260 ms, with a left temporo-parietal negativity for verbs (but also for animal names) and other topographies for different subsets of nouns (a left inferior temporal negativity for proper names and a bilateral positivity for numerals). In a series of studies conducted in German using nouns and verbs in a lexical decision task (Preissl et al, 1995;Pulvermuller et al, 1996Pulvermuller et al, , 1999a, word class differences have been reported beginning around 200 ms, with enhanced responses to verbs over fronto-central (possibly motor and premotor) areas and enhanced responses to nouns over occipital (possibly visual) areas. In addition to this early difference, Pulvermuller and colleagues have found that, between 500 and 800 ms, the spectral response around 30 Hz was enhanced for verbs at central sites but was stronger for nouns at sites over visual cortical areas (Pulvermuller et al, 1999a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metabolic neuroimaging studies showed that naming of animals and tools activates specific areas in left frontal, temporal and occipital lobes (for example, [11,24,38]). Neurophysiological studies, EEG and MEG, indicate that the differential involvement of frontal and occipital lobes in the processing of actionand visually-related words already begins 100-200 ms after word presentation (for example, [39,44,[46][47][48]). All of these data are evidence of differential contributions of the complementary language areas in the left dominant hemisphere to the processing of specific word categories [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%