2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain responses to olfactory and trigeminal exposure in idiopathic environmental illness (IEI) attributed to smells — An fMRI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results also may support the theory of response regulation by memory in the PFC. Andersson et al furthermore suggested the involvement of a limbic hyperreactivity and speculatively described the sensitivity with MCS as an inability to inhibit salient external stimuli in MCS [46]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results also may support the theory of response regulation by memory in the PFC. Andersson et al furthermore suggested the involvement of a limbic hyperreactivity and speculatively described the sensitivity with MCS as an inability to inhibit salient external stimuli in MCS [46]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, many studies have tried to find an unifying pathophysiology for all IEIs, focusing on CNS reactions to environmental stimuli, with activation changes of the brain areas related to sensory processing and emotional responses [1,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]41,42]. Since environmental noise has been recognised as an important health quality stressor [43], relevant literature up to now has focused mainly on auditory symptoms [21,22] without highlighting possible vestibular and postural consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible explanations for the rearranged model along vestibular processing and symptoms cohort referred to by MCS patients could be considered to reside within pathophysiological cascades, such as those involving limbic structures in the natural history of MCS [1,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. According to these notions, repeated exposure to MCS inducing agents were found to provide in MCS subjects both time-dependent sensitization and kindling, especially within hippocampal and limbic areas [65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent investigation reporting 18 F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-Dglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computer tomography (CT) cortical changes after a pure olfactory stimulation in MCS patients (Chiaravalloti et al 2015) demonstrated to overcome that possible unintended sensory stimulation (Alessandrini et al 2014a;Benjamin et al 2010;Hillert et al 2007;Orriols et al 2009, Azuma et al 2013Andersson et al 2014) related to such neuroimaging techniques coupling the olfactory task with the acquisition phase. These aspects could have constituted a possible common bias to the interpretation of the majority of existing data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%