2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Metastases From Breast Carcinoma: Validation of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Recursive Partitioning Analysis Classification and Proposition of a New Prognostic Score

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
43
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Certain studies demonstrated that the presence of pretreatment lymphopenia is associated with poor cancer survival or tumor response and it has not only prognostic, but also predictive potential (12-14). In a study conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, lymphopenia and hormone receptor negativity were found to be independent prognostic factors indicating poor survival in breast cancer patients with brain metastases (15). A more recent study conducted by the same group concluded that lymphocyte count and LDH levels may predict overall survival (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain studies demonstrated that the presence of pretreatment lymphopenia is associated with poor cancer survival or tumor response and it has not only prognostic, but also predictive potential (12-14). In a study conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, lymphopenia and hormone receptor negativity were found to be independent prognostic factors indicating poor survival in breast cancer patients with brain metastases (15). A more recent study conducted by the same group concluded that lymphocyte count and LDH levels may predict overall survival (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there have been conflicting findings, numerous variables have been shown to have some prognostic value including the following: Basal subtype (20,21,51); whole brain radiation dose of greater than or equal to 30 Gy (20,22); KPS (19,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30); presence/degree of extracranial metastases (21-23,27,30,31); primary tumor control (24,32); size of primary tumor (22); interval from first cancer diagnosis to brain metastases (23); number of brain metastases (22,23,32,33); solitary metastasis (22,34); age (19,21,24,30,34); ER status (21,24,26); HER2 expression (22,24,29,30,32,35); systemic chemotherapy (28); lymphopenia (29,36); and surgical resection (28,31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they acknowledge the shortcomings of their model and state, "Without doubt, the definitive prognostic score can only be created from a very large database." Other groups have also confirmed the prognostic value of the RPA system (20,29,31,37) and SIR in terms of survival (19,26). Le Scodan created a prognostic system based on the variables found to be statistically significant in their analysis however this was a small study (n=117) from a single institution, treated with WBRT alone (29).…”
Section: Other Indicesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These classes were based on the KPS score, primary tumor status, the presence of extracranial system metastases and age. Several studies have confirmed that the RPA classes are valid and reliable for historical comparisons (32,49).…”
Section: Natural Course and Prognostic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 87%