2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain intrinsic connection patterns underlying tool processing in human adults are present in neonates and not in macaques

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3.2, Ps corrected , 0.01; df = 167). Using the HCP RSFC data preprocessed in Wen at al. (2022), the results again showed strong alignment between the RSFC pattern and the functional activation pattern in pulvinar (for animals: within-domain r = 0.43, between-domain mean r = 0.03, within-vs betweendomain, Hotelling's t values .…”
Section: Individual Lateralization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3.2, Ps corrected , 0.01; df = 167). Using the HCP RSFC data preprocessed in Wen at al. (2022), the results again showed strong alignment between the RSFC pattern and the functional activation pattern in pulvinar (for animals: within-domain r = 0.43, between-domain mean r = 0.03, within-vs betweendomain, Hotelling's t values .…”
Section: Individual Lateralization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the broad principles of visual object processing in the human cortex is domain structure. Viewing several domains of objects, including animals, small manipulable objects (tools), and large nonmanipulable objects, has been found to elicit different patterns of response in distributed cortical regions, including and beyond the ventral temporal cortex, which has been explained by their association with evolutionary-salient functions, such as fight-or-flight (animals) or manipulation (tools) (He et al, 2013;Konkle and Caramazza, 2013;Garcea and Buxbaum, 2019;Schone et al, 2021;Wen et al, 2022; for review, see Bi et al, 2016;Peelen and Downing, 2017). Viewing tools elicits activation in a left-lateralized cortical network, including the left lateral occipitotemporal cortex, the inferior and superior parietal lobule, and the medial fusiform gyrus, which have been proposed to process various properties of tools that support its shape, use, and function (Brandi et al, 2014;Fabbri et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the Brainnetome Atlases in both humans and macaques have been completed, they offer a potential path for understanding brain evolution by comparative connectivities based on fine-grained brain parcellations across species. Many interesting topics related to evolutionary mechanisms, such as language and tool use, could be explored from the perspective of the Brainnetome Atlases 30,93,94 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although non-human primates share many tool capabilities, humans uniquely show greater manual dexterity and conceptual knowledge of tool use 70 . Considerable divergence was found in the tool processing network nodes 70,77 , the inferior frontal gyrus, and the most rostroventral inferior parietal lobule (A40rv). These two regions were connected by the IFOF and SLF3, which have been linked with the human tool-use circuit [78][79][80] and showed a different connectivity pattern between chimpanzees and humans.…”
Section: Connectivity Divergence Between Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%