2019
DOI: 10.1289/ehp4869
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Fog: Does Air Pollution Make Us Less Productive?

Abstract: The regulation of air pollution has reduced its toll on heart and lung diseases. For example, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 helped avert an estimated 160,000 deaths and 86,000 hospitalizations in 2010 alone. 1 However, a growing body of research suggests that polluted air also puts our brain in harm's way. Chronic exposure to traffic-related pollutants may increase the risk of neurological disorders. 2 Both short-and long-term exposures have been associated with reduced human capital, including the acad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Note that the increase in standard errors for the analysis on this subset of workers is likely due to a combination of the much smaller sample size and an increase in classical measurement error. Given the long commutes of many of the workers, their amount of pollution exposure may be measured with more error (see Bloom et al 2015 for details regarding the characteristics of the workers in the Working From Home experiment) 17 Including worker fixed effects does not meaningfully affect the results (Appendix Table A1). 11,897 14,886 11,892 14,800 Notes: The logarithm of the indicated dependent variable is the outcome of interest.…”
Section: Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Note that the increase in standard errors for the analysis on this subset of workers is likely due to a combination of the much smaller sample size and an increase in classical measurement error. Given the long commutes of many of the workers, their amount of pollution exposure may be measured with more error (see Bloom et al 2015 for details regarding the characteristics of the workers in the Working From Home experiment) 17 Including worker fixed effects does not meaningfully affect the results (Appendix Table A1). 11,897 14,886 11,892 14,800 Notes: The logarithm of the indicated dependent variable is the outcome of interest.…”
Section: Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, from a micro‐perspective, organizations with a colossal bundle of HC may possess higher prospects for considerably diminishing the environmental costs (Sharif et al, 2019). Conversely, environmental pollution is also identified as having possibly the largest influence on HC depreciation via loss of health, labor value, population, and market size (Schmidt, 2019). Again, although HC is found to constructively lower environmental degradation (Bano et al, 2018; Hao et al, 2021; Huang et al, 2021; Rahman et al, 2021), there is also evidence of its positive impact (Haini, 2021; Khan et al, 2021; Li et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure to aerosol particles for a long time also have an adverse impact on human health, especially fine aerosol particles from industries/urban emission. Moreover, ambient fine aerosol particles less than 2.5 micrometers have attracted public attention Because they can lead to several potential disease risks, such as respiratory, lung, cardiovascular diseases, even the neurological disorders (Schmidt 2019). However, ambient aerosols are difficult to quantify accurately due to the high spatial and temporal variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%