2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2006.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Death Does Not Change Epicardial Action Potentials and Their Response to Ischemia–Reperfusion in Open-chest Pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 A second peak was observed 45 minutes after BD in one study 32 and even several hours after death in another study. 25,33 This later catecholamine surge could be attributed to the adrenal response to BD, as suggested by investigators such as Chen et al 31 In our series of BD donors, catecholamine levels above normal were detected in most cases. Our results clearly reflect the expected release profile for epinephrine, yet levels detected at the time of BD peaked at only 2.36-fold.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…31 A second peak was observed 45 minutes after BD in one study 32 and even several hours after death in another study. 25,33 This later catecholamine surge could be attributed to the adrenal response to BD, as suggested by investigators such as Chen et al 31 In our series of BD donors, catecholamine levels above normal were detected in most cases. Our results clearly reflect the expected release profile for epinephrine, yet levels detected at the time of BD peaked at only 2.36-fold.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Even though the time elapsed for delivery of 3 pulses with 30 ms duration would be shorter that the reported action potential duration recorded in vitro in swine ventricle at physiological temperatures (> 100 ms; Roscher et al, 2001), it is possible that the in vivo conditions, such as transient myocardial ischemia and increased catecholamine release, resulting from the interruption of cardiac pumping during VF, may have resulted in action potential shortening (Christé et al, 2006;Hoeker et al, 2014). In this case, it is likely that defibrillatory pulses would reach some cells during the relative refractory period (vulnerable period), which would favor arrhythmia reinitiation (Corbisiero et al, 1999), thus masking or even reverting the beneficial effect of multidirectional defibrillation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…To our knowledge, comparative data of cellular electrophysiological properties of brain‐dead versus fresh pig hearts have not been reported. In a previous study using surface electrodes on cardiac muscle during a 3 h brain‐dead period, 8 it was found that the action potential or ischemia responses were not affected. Our studies include a longer brain‐dead period and a period in cardioplegia closer to the clinical situation, and it is possible that we identify changes in the myocardium that are not detectable on the epicardial surface or that develop at later stages, that is, after more than 3 h.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Also, studies of excitation‐contraction in the myocardium are few. Experiments on 3‐h brain death in pigs have suggested that no major changes in epicardial action potential occur 8 . Further characterization of coronary vessels and myocardium of the brain‐dead heart is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%