2015
DOI: 10.3109/00952990.2015.1058389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain cortical thickness in male adolescents with serious substance use and conduct problems

Abstract: Background Adolescents with substance use disorder (SUD) and conduct problems exhibit high levels of impulsivity and poor self-control. Limited work to date tests for brain cortical thickness differences in these youths. Objectives To investigate differences in cortical thickness between adolescents with substance use and conduct problems and controls. Methods We recruited 25 male adolescents with SUD, and 19 male adolescent controls, and completed structural 3T magnetic resonance brain imaging. Using the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During late adolescence and young adulthood, both female and male cannabis users had smaller grey matter volumes than non-users in decision making and executive function areas of the brain, i.e., the medial orbitofrontal and inferior parietal cortices [84]. In adolescents with substance use disorder and co-morbid conduct problems, many of whom were cannabis dependent, females had less cortical thickness in parts of the anterior cingulate cortex and medial orbitofrontal cortex compared to female controls [85], with no similar effect observed in males [86]. In a separate set of studies, comparably characterized subjects had significantly less grey matter volume than gender-matched controls in left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, in males [87] and females [88], respectively.…”
Section: Adolescent Cannabis Exposure Effects On Adolescence and Adulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During late adolescence and young adulthood, both female and male cannabis users had smaller grey matter volumes than non-users in decision making and executive function areas of the brain, i.e., the medial orbitofrontal and inferior parietal cortices [84]. In adolescents with substance use disorder and co-morbid conduct problems, many of whom were cannabis dependent, females had less cortical thickness in parts of the anterior cingulate cortex and medial orbitofrontal cortex compared to female controls [85], with no similar effect observed in males [86]. In a separate set of studies, comparably characterized subjects had significantly less grey matter volume than gender-matched controls in left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, in males [87] and females [88], respectively.…”
Section: Adolescent Cannabis Exposure Effects On Adolescence and Adulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another all male sample, adolescents with substance use disorder (SUD) and conduct problems had less posterior cingulate cortex cortical thickness, which is critical to response inhibition. A positive association between lifetime conduct disorder symptoms and superior temporal gyrus thickness also was reported (Chumachenko et al, 2015). In an all female cohort, adolescent females with severe substance use and conduct problems were found to have significantly smaller overall whole brain gray matter volume, as well as smaller frontal (right DLPFC, left ventrolateral PFC, medial OFC, ACC) and parietal volumes relative to controls (Dalwani et al, 2015).…”
Section: Neurobiological Findings In Current Alcohol and Drug Usinmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Using our previously-published male sample [76] for comparisons, we found no differences in cortical thickness between male and female patients and no differences between male and female controls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Lastly, we have previously published very similar analyses testing brain cortical thickness patient-control differences in cortical thickness in a male adolescent sample [76]. This study used essentially the same recruitment procedures, inclusion/exclusion criteria and imaging parameters (see S1 Table.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%