2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04271-3_59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Connectivity Using Geodesics in HARDI

Abstract: Abstract. We develop an algorithm for brain connectivity assessment using geodesics in HARDI (high angular resolution diffusion imaging). We propose to recast the problem of finding fibers bundles and connectivity maps to the calculation of shortest paths on a Riemannian manifold defined from fiber ODFs computed from HARDI measurements. Several experiments on real data show that our method is able to segment fibers bundles that are not easily recovered by other existing methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…always provides the optimal solution. Compared with wavefront propagation methods on the extended domain of positions and orientations in image analysis [28,29], we consider a SR metric instead of a Riemannian metric. Results in retinal vessel tracking are promising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…always provides the optimal solution. Compared with wavefront propagation methods on the extended domain of positions and orientations in image analysis [28,29], we consider a SR metric instead of a Riemannian metric. Results in retinal vessel tracking are promising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: geodesics in such a Riemannian space will tend to align themselves with the eigenvector corresponding with the smallest eigenvalues of T x [231,215,139]. They will thus follow high-diffusion paths, which are likely to correspond to white matter fibers (Figure 3.16).…”
Section: Metric W (X)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Geodesics corresponding to major white matter fibers bundles in left hemisphere, obtained with the geodesic method of[215].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their simplicity, these methods are prone to cumulative errors caused by noise, partial volume effects, and discrete integration, and have difficulty in distinguishing fiber crossing and kissing mostly due to the fact that the entire diffusion information is not globally used and integrated. This led to the development of other successful approaches, including probabilistic techniques (Behrens et al, 2007; Björnemo et al, 2002; Descoteaux et al, 2009; Friman et al, 2006; Jones, 2008; Lazar & Alexander, 2005; Parker et al, 2003), global techniques based on front propagation (Campbell et al, 2005; Jackowski et al, 2005; Parker et al, 2002; Pichon et al, 2005; Prados et al, 2006; Tournier et al, 2003), simulation of the diffusion process or fluid flow (Batchelor et al, 2001; Hageman et al, 2009; Hagmann et al, 2003; Kang et al, 2005; O'Donnell et al, 2002; Yörük et al, 2005), DWI geodesic computations (Jbabdi et al, 2008; Lenglet et al, 2009a; Melonakos et al, 2007; Pechaud et al, 2009), graph theoretical techniques (Iturria-Medina et al, 2007; Sotiropoulos et al, 2010; Zalesky, 2008), spin glass models (Fillard et al, 2009; Mangin et al, 2002), and Gibbs tracking (Kreher et al, 2008). Generally speaking, for virtually every tractography method, a particular putative subset of all possible curves is implicitly considered from which the resulting tracts are chosen according to some criteria, which are different depending on the particular selection strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%