“…Despite their simplicity, these methods are prone to cumulative errors caused by noise, partial volume effects, and discrete integration, and have difficulty in distinguishing fiber crossing and kissing mostly due to the fact that the entire diffusion information is not globally used and integrated. This led to the development of other successful approaches, including probabilistic techniques (Behrens et al, 2007; Björnemo et al, 2002; Descoteaux et al, 2009; Friman et al, 2006; Jones, 2008; Lazar & Alexander, 2005; Parker et al, 2003), global techniques based on front propagation (Campbell et al, 2005; Jackowski et al, 2005; Parker et al, 2002; Pichon et al, 2005; Prados et al, 2006; Tournier et al, 2003), simulation of the diffusion process or fluid flow (Batchelor et al, 2001; Hageman et al, 2009; Hagmann et al, 2003; Kang et al, 2005; O'Donnell et al, 2002; Yörük et al, 2005), DWI geodesic computations (Jbabdi et al, 2008; Lenglet et al, 2009a; Melonakos et al, 2007; Pechaud et al, 2009), graph theoretical techniques (Iturria-Medina et al, 2007; Sotiropoulos et al, 2010; Zalesky, 2008), spin glass models (Fillard et al, 2009; Mangin et al, 2002), and Gibbs tracking (Kreher et al, 2008). Generally speaking, for virtually every tractography method, a particular putative subset of all possible curves is implicitly considered from which the resulting tracts are chosen according to some criteria, which are different depending on the particular selection strategy.…”