The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1111/ene.14695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain connectivity abnormalities and treatment‐induced restorations in patients with cervical dystonia

Abstract: Background The relationship between brain abnormalities and phenotypic characteristics in cervical dystonia (CD) patients has not been fully established, and little is known about the neuroplastic changes induced by botulinum toxin type A (BoNT‐A) treatment. Methods Ninety‐two CD patients presenting with rotational torticollis and 45 healthy controls from our database were retrospectively screened. After clinical assessment, the 92 patients underwent baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) followed by a sing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this proves challenging for DBS (a pre-post FC design is technically difficult due to the challenges of MRI after DBS including both safety and susceptibility artifact introduced from DBS lead sites), there have been some observational studies investigating FC changes after treatment with botulinum toxin in focal (cervical) dystonia and blepharospasm. 26,27,[35][36][37] Taken together, these studies demonstrate that brain network changes associated with clinical treatment in movement disorders can be respectively measured with FC.…”
Section: Diseasementioning
confidence: 60%
“…While this proves challenging for DBS (a pre-post FC design is technically difficult due to the challenges of MRI after DBS including both safety and susceptibility artifact introduced from DBS lead sites), there have been some observational studies investigating FC changes after treatment with botulinum toxin in focal (cervical) dystonia and blepharospasm. 26,27,[35][36][37] Taken together, these studies demonstrate that brain network changes associated with clinical treatment in movement disorders can be respectively measured with FC.…”
Section: Diseasementioning
confidence: 60%
“…For dystonia, 46 articles were included, ( Zhang et al, 2020 , Pan et al, 2019 , Jochim et al, 2018 , Putzel et al, 2018 , Mantel et al, 2018 , Ni et al, 2017 , Huang et al, 2017 , Li et al, 2017 , Long et al, 2017 , Haslinger et al, 2017 , Kiyuna et al, 2017 , Battistella et al, 2016 , Sarasso et al, 2020 , Liu et al, 2016 , Ren et al, 2015 , Bharath et al, 2015 , Dresel et al, 2014 , Delnooz et al, 2015 , Hinkley et al, 2013 , Delnooz et al, 2013 , Delnooz et al, 2012 , Mohammadi et al, 2012 , Wei et al, 2021 , Jiang et al, 2019 , Pan et al, 2021 , Feng e al., 2021 , de Faria et al, 2020 , Norris et al, 2020 , Glickman et al, 2020 , Mantel et al, 2020 , Ma et al, 2021 , Corp et al, 2019 , Fang et al, 2021 , Giannì et al, 2022 , Qin et al, 2019 , Zito et al, 2022 , Kim et al, 2022 , Hou et al, 2022 , Ekmen et al, 2022 , Nieuwhof et al, 2022 , Filip et al, 2022 , Battistella and Simonyan, 2019 , Bianchi et al, 2019 , Kita et al, 2018 , Fuertinger and Simonyan, 2018 , Qin et al, 2018 ) concerning cervical dystonia (CD; n = 14), writer’s cramp (n = 10), laryngeal dystonia (n = 8), musician's dystonia (n = 5), paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia (n = 6), blepharospasm (n = 6), oromandibular dystonia (n = 2), dyskinetic cerebral palsy (n = 2), spastic cerebral palsy (n = 1), dystonic tremor (n = 1), and generalized dystonia (n = 1). Most studies matched patients and healthy participants for age and gender.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 26 studies investigating the relationship between clinical measures and resting-state brain connectivity, 10 found no significant correlation. Eight studies describe positive relationships between motor severity and brain function: 1) FC between the left and right calcarine cortex and in the SMA; ( Qin et al, 2019 ) 2) fALFF and ReHo in the caudate nucleus; ( Ni et al, 2017 ) 3) FC between both caudate nuclei; ( Ni et al, 2017 ) 4) FC between thalamus and caudate nucleus; ( Kiyuna et al, 2017 ) 5) FC between precentral gyrus and insula, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, postcentral gyrus, and thalamus; ( Dresel et al, 2014 ) 6) ReHo in cerebellum; ( Wei et al, 2021 ) 7) FC between prefrontal cortex and postcentral gyrus, and between postcentral gyrus and caudate nucleus; ( Feng, 2021 ) 8) connectivity in the cerebellum; ( Glickman et al, 2020 ) 9) FC in supramarginal gyrus and postcentral gyrus. ( Ma et al, 2021 ) Conversely, three studies describe negative relationships between motor severity and brain function: 1) FC between both SMA; ( Jiang et al, 2019 ) 2) FC between cerebellum and visual cortex; ( Jochim et al, 2018 ) 3) FC in the superior parietal cortex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 34 , 44 , 45 In other forms of dystonia, increased gray matter volume and decreased functional connectivity of middle frontal gyrus have been reported in blepharospasm, 46 , 47 its reduced structural connectivity with the basal ganglia and increased activity after positive feedback learning found in writer's cramp, 48 , 49 and pretreatment homogeneity related to varied response to BoNT injections identified in cervical dystonia. 50 By modulating middle frontal activity, BoNT treatment in these patients may have a cascading effect on the frontoparietal network activity and, hence, the control of higher-order executive function during learning and coordination of the correct sequences of complex motor behaviors, such as speech production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. dystonia 50 . By modulating middle frontal activity, BoNT treatment in these patients may have cascading effects on frontoparietal network activity and, hence, the control of higher-order executive function during learning and coordination of the correct sequences of complex motor behaviors, such as speech production.…”
Section: Long-term Central Effects Of Bont Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%