2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2886708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Computer Interface for Neurodegenerative Person Using Electroencephalogram

Abstract: Brain-computer interface (BCI) connects the outside world, in real time and in a natural way, like biological communication system. It facilitates the communication link from the brain to the external world by converting brain thoughts in to control commands to control the external devices, such as wheelchair, keyboard mouse, and other home appliances. Measuring the electrical brain activity by placing electrodes over scalp is called electroencephalogram (EEG). By combining these two techniques, we are able to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An analysis of upper limb movements in the timedomain of low-frequency electroencephalography (EEG) signals was carried out in [42]. Brain signals are analyzed using band power and radial basis function and implemented on the wheel chair [43]. A non-contact control system is designed that allows the paralyzed patients to get assistance in the hospital by activating the nurse emergency system and adjusting other appliances.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of upper limb movements in the timedomain of low-frequency electroencephalography (EEG) signals was carried out in [42]. Brain signals are analyzed using band power and radial basis function and implemented on the wheel chair [43]. A non-contact control system is designed that allows the paralyzed patients to get assistance in the hospital by activating the nurse emergency system and adjusting other appliances.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the papers reviewed, 81% (54 papers) presented results that included an asynchronous control paradigm, while the rest presented results only for synchronous control paradigms. Although results generated using synchronous control could achieve high accuracies [ 24 , 25 ], they increase the latencies experienced by the subject and are not feasible for many practical BCIs; in particular, for the brain control of dynamic devices. This is because a synchronous control paradigm would lead to episodic movements in dynamic devices such as prosthetics, exoskeletons, and wheelchairs, which should ideally execute commands in real time to ensure smooth movement.…”
Section: Synchronous Vs Asynchronous Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there was no feedback connection between the three layers, all the three layers were moved only in the frontward direction from the input layer to the hidden layer and from the hidden layer to the output layer. Basically, FFNN was trained with default parameters with a default training algorithm [37]. But in our research, we planned to change the benchmark training algorithm to a bioinspired optimization algorithm called crow search algorithm (CSA) to optimize the neural network model to analyze the different patterns generated from the subjects during the classification process, and also we compared the results gathered in the study.…”
Section: Feed Forward Neural Network (Ffnn)mentioning
confidence: 99%