2011
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain-Computer Interface Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation System for Ankle Movement

Abstract: BackgroundMany neurological conditions, such as stroke, spinal cord injury, and traumatic brain injury, can cause chronic gait function impairment due to foot-drop. Current physiotherapy techniques provide only a limited degree of motor function recovery in these individuals, and therefore novel therapies are needed. Brain-computer interface (BCI) is a relatively novel technology with a potential to restore, substitute, or augment lost motor behaviors in patients with neurological injuries. Here, we describe t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
99
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
99
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As has been confirmed with behavioral experiments (Talwar et al, 2002; Fitzsimmons et al, 2007; London et al, 2008; Do et al, 2011, 2012; Semprini et al, 2012), MiSt has the potential to be used as sensory feedback for closed-loop brain-machine-interface (BMI) devices (Vato et al, 2012; Liao et al, 2013). However, the short- and long-term effects of such artificial input to the brain have not been fully described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As has been confirmed with behavioral experiments (Talwar et al, 2002; Fitzsimmons et al, 2007; London et al, 2008; Do et al, 2011, 2012; Semprini et al, 2012), MiSt has the potential to be used as sensory feedback for closed-loop brain-machine-interface (BMI) devices (Vato et al, 2012; Liao et al, 2013). However, the short- and long-term effects of such artificial input to the brain have not been fully described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, detection of movement onset from EEG can be highly variable, ranging at least 100–300 ms [57,58]. Reliability can be improved with longer sampling times, but at the expense of even greater latency [59]. It is worth asking whether the apparent decreased sensitivity to timing [50,51] in these experiments compared to STDP or PAS (Figure 2) is simply due to the imprecision of movement detection by EEG.…”
Section: Guiding Plasticity For Neurorehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EEGs are affected due to different degree of alertness as example the separate sleeping periods result in different EEG characteristics. There are several techniques proposed by Do et al [1], Domino et al [2], and Jacobs & Friedman [3], in integration the EEG and FES and the challenging of EEG signals mainly due to its small amplitude. The EEG signal passes through dura, cerebrospinal fluid and skull to scalp will produces peak-to-peak amplitude is only about 1 ~ 100 V with frequency range 0.5 ~ 100 Hz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%