2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2011.04.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain computer interface control via functional connectivity dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
71
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, the performance of BCI systems would be higher by including frontally positioned electrodes as suggested by Leocani, Toro, Manganotti, Zhuang, and Hallett (1997). In association with this work, Daly, Nasuto, and Warwick (2012) recently reported that dynamics of inter-regional communication changes during real and imagined single finger taps compared to the rest state. The functional connectivity analysis incorporating the electrodes in frontal area should be possible to observe more carefully the time dependent phenomenon from motor intention, motor planning, and execution based on the dynamical networking of functional connectivity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Fourth, the performance of BCI systems would be higher by including frontally positioned electrodes as suggested by Leocani, Toro, Manganotti, Zhuang, and Hallett (1997). In association with this work, Daly, Nasuto, and Warwick (2012) recently reported that dynamics of inter-regional communication changes during real and imagined single finger taps compared to the rest state. The functional connectivity analysis incorporating the electrodes in frontal area should be possible to observe more carefully the time dependent phenomenon from motor intention, motor planning, and execution based on the dynamical networking of functional connectivity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Although there are no general guidelines, classification systems are considered acceptable when their AUC is higher than 0.7 [39]. In BCI applications, a threshold of 0.8 is typically used in order to obtain a level of performance that guarantees that the time that it takes to output a symbol (including corrections to errors made by the system) will not be too long to discourage users (e.g., [40], [41]). …”
Section: ) Detection Of the P300 Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many human brain-computer interfaces are used for therapeutic purposes, in order to overcome a medical/neurological problem, one example being, as will be discussed shortly, deep brain stimulation electrodes employed to overcome the effects of Parkinson's disease (Pinter et al 1999, Pan et al 2012, Wu et al 2010a, or the use of external electrodes to understand the functioning of parts of the brain (Daly et al 2012). However it is possible to consider employing such technology in alternative ways to give individuals abilities not normally possessed by humanshuman enhancement!…”
Section: General-purpose Brain Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%