2018
DOI: 10.1111/jep.12915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain‐based treatment—A new approach or a well‐forgotten old one?

Abstract: For a relatively long period of time, mental functioning was mainly associated with personal profile while brain functioning went by the wayside. After the 90s of the 20th century, or the so called "Decade of the Brain", today, contemporary specialists work on the boundary between fundamental science and medicine. This brings neuroscience, neuropsychology, psychiatry, and psychotherapy closer to each other. Today, we definitely know that brain structures are being built and altered thanks to experience. Psycho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neuroscience operates validation procedures on an essentially similar basis, in search for post hoc correlations with the associated psychological scores and several papers in this Special Section exemplify an attempt to methodologically integrate the data from neuroscience with those from clinical psychological and neuropsychiatric evaluation. Here, the works by Kandilarova and colleagues, Haralanov, Terziivanova, and associates, Iancheva and co‐workers, and Gaberova, Yordanova, and colleagues are noteworthy and should be read alongside the contribution by Matanova et al who discuss the importance of brain‐based therapeutic strategies, although the identification of various inconsistencies calls for further investigations within the frameworks outlined.…”
Section: Translating the Findings Of Neuroscience Into Clinical Medicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuroscience operates validation procedures on an essentially similar basis, in search for post hoc correlations with the associated psychological scores and several papers in this Special Section exemplify an attempt to methodologically integrate the data from neuroscience with those from clinical psychological and neuropsychiatric evaluation. Here, the works by Kandilarova and colleagues, Haralanov, Terziivanova, and associates, Iancheva and co‐workers, and Gaberova, Yordanova, and colleagues are noteworthy and should be read alongside the contribution by Matanova et al who discuss the importance of brain‐based therapeutic strategies, although the identification of various inconsistencies calls for further investigations within the frameworks outlined.…”
Section: Translating the Findings Of Neuroscience Into Clinical Medicmentioning
confidence: 99%