2021
DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.210715.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain-Based Learning Teaching Materials to Improve Critical Thinking Skills and Literacy Skills of Students

Abstract: The optimal learning process is able to facilitate learning activities that are in harmony with the workings of the brain. In order for the learning process to take place optimally it is necessary to prepare adequate learning materials; one example is what is known as Brain-Based Learning teaching materials. This study is intended to analyze the effect of Brain-Based Learning teaching materials on critical thinking skills and students' scientific literacy abilities. The analysis was carried out using the Syste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…According to (Facione, 2018) in Table 3, indicators of essential thinking skills. Research conducted by Zakaria and Purwoko (2021) states that critical thinking abilities must be acquired through education, specifically through developing futureready living abilities. Students are declared to have the ability to think critically on five indicators, namely: 1) making decisions on problem-solving steps, 2) analyzing, 3) making inferences, 4) evaluating, and 5) making conclusions (Jatmiko et al, 2021;Neswary & Prahani, 2022;Rizki et al, 2023;Rohmah & Prahani, 2021;Saphira & Prahani, 2022).…”
Section: Students' Critical Thinking Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (Facione, 2018) in Table 3, indicators of essential thinking skills. Research conducted by Zakaria and Purwoko (2021) states that critical thinking abilities must be acquired through education, specifically through developing futureready living abilities. Students are declared to have the ability to think critically on five indicators, namely: 1) making decisions on problem-solving steps, 2) analyzing, 3) making inferences, 4) evaluating, and 5) making conclusions (Jatmiko et al, 2021;Neswary & Prahani, 2022;Rizki et al, 2023;Rohmah & Prahani, 2021;Saphira & Prahani, 2022).…”
Section: Students' Critical Thinking Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pada 19 subjek (AAH, ANP, BKY, EFH, IGP, JAR, MQ, MA, MAF, MAR, MAMR, MOS, NF, NJR, QA, RZ, R, SAR, dan SR) mereka belum bisa dikatakan baik kemampuan membacanya karena masih salah dalam membaca baik membaca huruf, kata, dan memahami makna kalimat. Sejalan dengan kegiatan membaca tidak hanya berhenti pada pengenalan bentuk, melainkan harus sampai pada tahap pengenalan makna dari bentukbentuk yang dibaca (Zakaria et al, 2021).…”
Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified
“…Penelitian yang dilakukan merupakan penelitian dan pengembangan. Model pengembangan yang dilakukan adalah dikemukakan oleh Thiagarajan, Semmel, & Semmel (Zakaria, Purwoko, & Hadisaputra, 2020) yaitu model 4D atau diterjemahkan menjadi model 4P yang terdiri dari pendefinisian, perancangan, pengembangan, dan penyebaran. Dalam artikel ini akan dijelaskan sampai tahap pengembangan bahan ajar yaitu uji ahli.…”
Section: Metodeunclassified
“…Kesalahan ini bisa berupa kesalahan karena kegagalan mekanis atau slip tangan atau jari, juga bisa timbul ebagai akibat dari ketidaktahuan penulis misal kesalahan ejaan (Fahma, Cholissodin, & Perdana, 2018). Kesalahn penulisan ternyata menjadi salah satu hal yang juga ditemuai pada pengembangan bahan ajar oleh penelitian lain seperti penelitian (Zakaria, Purwoko, & Hadisaputra, 2020).…”
Section: Gambar 7 Definisi Sesudah Diberikan Dekorasiunclassified