2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurad.2008.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain and spine MRI artifacts at 3Tesla

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Imaging of the cervical spine is of higher quality at 3T; however, artifacts remain at the thoracic level. 25 In clinical routine, an adaptation of the FOV and resolution of MR images in children by age is recommended.…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging of the cervical spine is of higher quality at 3T; however, artifacts remain at the thoracic level. 25 In clinical routine, an adaptation of the FOV and resolution of MR images in children by age is recommended.…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Nevertheless, artifacts and lower lesion conspicuity prevalent on these sequences may cause variability in the clinical evaluation of lesion burden, which is difficult to resolve in the absence of a true reference standard. 8 Reliable characteriza-tion of the lesion burden on follow-up examinations is therefore important for assessing treatment efficacy and optimizing treatment strategies. Many novel sequences have been devised attempting to improve imaging quality and lesion conspicuity with fewer artifacts and with a reasonable acquisition time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different strategies to reduce CSF artifacts including techniques to reduce time of flight and flow-related enhancement effects as well as increased numbers of excitations (prolonging scan time) or swapping of the phase and frequency encoding directions [17]. In this study, we compared T2 BLADE imaging of the cervical spine in axial orientation with our optimized T2 TSE and found that BLADE with appropriate selection of measurement parameters did improve image quality and lesion depiction without aggravation of CSF-flow artifacts seen in previous studies.…”
Section: Neuroradiology 105mentioning
confidence: 99%