2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain activity for chronic knee osteoarthritis: Dissociating evoked pain from spontaneous pain

Abstract: Chronic pain is a hallmark of osteoarthritis (OA), yet little is known about its properties and representation in the brain. Here we use fMRI combined with psychophysics to study knee pain in 14 OA patients and 9 healthy controls. Mechanical painful pressure stimuli were applied to the knee in both groups and ratings of evoked pain and related brain activity examined. We observe that psychophysical properties and brain activation patterns of evoked pain are essentially the same between OA patients and healthy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
120
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(69 reference statements)
12
120
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, there was no correlation between disease severity and evoked nerve firing, corroborating the clinical observation that joint destruction is a poor predictor of pain [63]. Brain imaging of OA patients revealed increased brain activity in regions commonly associated with the emotional aspect of pain, compared to normal subjects receiving a noxious thermal stimulus [64]. This finding points to neuroplastic changes in the brain of OA patients, although this outcome may not be purely driven by peripheral neuropathy.…”
Section: Neuropathic Oa Painsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Furthermore, there was no correlation between disease severity and evoked nerve firing, corroborating the clinical observation that joint destruction is a poor predictor of pain [63]. Brain imaging of OA patients revealed increased brain activity in regions commonly associated with the emotional aspect of pain, compared to normal subjects receiving a noxious thermal stimulus [64]. This finding points to neuroplastic changes in the brain of OA patients, although this outcome may not be purely driven by peripheral neuropathy.…”
Section: Neuropathic Oa Painsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…These changes also indicate brain plasticity, which induces a facilitation of nociceptive inputs (Gwilym et al, 2009) and an increased modulation of pain by the medial pain pathway (associated with affective dimension of pain) (Kulkarni et al, 2007;Parks et al, 2011). In a functional MRI study during quantitative sensory testing, human OA patients presented enhanced activity in the PAG compared with healthy controls (Gwilym et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A final consideration is that QST, which quantifies responses to experimentally induced pain, may evoke different central nervous system responses than does spontaneous pain, normally experienced by patients, as demonstrated by brain imaging studies. 44 Therefore, the development of better clinical tools for the assessment of sensory hypersensitivity is needed. The recommendation that the assessment of descending pain modulation and pain magnitude rating for a suprathreshold stimulus might facilitate a better 1 (2.5) 1 (2.5) 1 (2.5) 1 (2.5) 1 (6) 2 (12) 1 (6) 2 (12) Kinesiophobia (TSK!37/68) 3 (7.5) 2 (5) 2 (5) 4 (10) 2 (12) 4 (23.5) 0 (0) 4 (23.5) NPRS!5/10 5 (12.5) 4 (10) 7 (17.5) 9 (22.5) 4 (23.5) 4 (23.5) 1 (6) 4 (23.5) Hyperalgesia (yes) 3 (7.5) 2 (5) 1 (2.5) 0 (0) 2 (12) 0 (0) 1 (6) 1 (6) Allodynia (yes) 2 (5) 1 (2.5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (6) 0 (0) 1 (6) 1 (6) NOTE.…”
Section: Clinical Features and Sensory Phenotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%