Brain activity during reading The effects of exposure duration and task

Abstract

Brain activity during reading tasks was investigated using PET. The aim was to account for differences in the results of two previous studies [those of Petersen et al. (Science 1990; 249: 1041-4) and Howard et al. (Brain 1992; 115: 1769-82)] by systematically varying the type of reading task and the exposure duration of the word stimuli. Both variables strongly influenced patterns of brain activity. There were three types of task: (i) reading aloud; (ii) reading silently; and (iii) lexical decision on visually presented words and pseudowords. Reading aloud and reading silently engaged the left middle and superior temporal regions, confirming the important role of these areas in visual word processing. The areas principally engaged during lexical decision were the left inferior and middle frontal cortices and the supplementary motor area; activity in these areas suggests that the subjects were using a phonological strategy to perform the task. There was also a significant effect of exposure duration, with activity being greater for short (150 ms) exposure durations than for long (1000 ms or 981 ms) exposure durations. We conclude that until we understand how subtle variations in experimental design influence brain activity during reading tasks, the association of specific processing functions with individual anatomical areas activated during reading is premature.

Neural processing of nouns and verbs: the role of inflectional morphology

“…These are the regions that are typically activated in imaging studies involving the processing of written words when the task involves semantic processing (e.g., Price et al, 1994;Rumsey et al, 1997). In the direct contrast between nouns and verbs, we found that only the LIFG was activated significantly more strongly for verbs compared to nouns.…”

Dissociation in the neural basis underlying Chinese tone and vowel production

“…The left middle frontal gyrus has been found to be activated always together with left inferior frontal gyrus in language production studies (Petersen et al, 1988;Price et al, 1994). Both are deemed to play a role in phonological encoding (Indefrey and Levelt, 2000;Levelt and Indefrey, 2001).…”

Effects of prefrontal lesions on lexical processing and repetition priming: an ERP study

“…These results will also be related to the neuroimaging literature. 56,64 , leading the former authors to conclude that the subjects adopted a phonological strategy to perform the task.…”