2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.113096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain activity changes in a monkey model of central post-stroke pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
11

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
27
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to functionally identify SI D2 as the target of focal chemogenetic silencing, we measured BOLD signal in response to sensory stimulation using 7T-MRI under light sedation with propofol (Figures 1A and S1A-S1C; STAR Methods). Consistent with previous studies (Arcaro et al, 2019;Chen et al, 2007;Cle ´ry et al, 2020;Dutta et al, 2014;Hayashi et al, 1999;Lipton et al, 2006;Nagasaka et al, 2020;Sharma et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2013), cutaneous tactile stimulation of hand D2 evoked a significant BOLD response at the contralateral SI (p < 0.05, FWE-corrected) (Figure 1B; STAR Methods). We then injected an AAV vector for the neuron-specific expression of inhibitory DREADD (hM4Di) with GFP as a marker protein into the identified SI D2 (Figure 1A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to functionally identify SI D2 as the target of focal chemogenetic silencing, we measured BOLD signal in response to sensory stimulation using 7T-MRI under light sedation with propofol (Figures 1A and S1A-S1C; STAR Methods). Consistent with previous studies (Arcaro et al, 2019;Chen et al, 2007;Cle ´ry et al, 2020;Dutta et al, 2014;Hayashi et al, 1999;Lipton et al, 2006;Nagasaka et al, 2020;Sharma et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2013), cutaneous tactile stimulation of hand D2 evoked a significant BOLD response at the contralateral SI (p < 0.05, FWE-corrected) (Figure 1B; STAR Methods). We then injected an AAV vector for the neuron-specific expression of inhibitory DREADD (hM4Di) with GFP as a marker protein into the identified SI D2 (Figure 1A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The upregulated foot sole representation raised the possibility that the same manipulation might also increase behavioral sensitivity to sensory stimulation of the contralateral foot (Nagasaka et al, 2017(Nagasaka et al, , 2020. To test this prediction, we applied a cold (10 C) stimulation, which is known to activate SI in both humans and macaques (Egan et al, 2005;Nagasaka et al, 2017), to the foot sole contralateral to the DREADD-expressing hemisphere, and examined whether focal silencing of the SI hand region behaviorally affects the withdrawal latency of the foot sole from the cold stimulation (Nagasaka et al, 2017(Nagasaka et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A previous study using the same CPSP model monkeys reported that painful stimulation induced changes in the blood oxygenation level-dependent response in pain-related brain areas, including the posterior insular cortex, S2, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and amygdala 32 . Similar results were also reported in studies comparing pain response in healthy individuals and individuals with chronic pain 33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these drugs influence the activity of brain regions associated with pain. In this study, we used propofol as the anaesthetic, as in a recent fMRI study using primate CPSP models 32 . Propofol is considered to have few analgesic effects 39 ; however, we cannot ignore the effects of anaesthetics on the brain function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%