2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2009.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain activation during executive processes in schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bearing in mind that the patients have psychotic symptoms and general clinical impairments, this pattern suggests the operation of compensatory neural mechanisms that led to overall successful task performance when compared to healthy controls. A number of previous studies have similarly observed compensatory BOLD increases on the background of comparable task performance in schizophrenia patients (Karch et al 2009; Lee et al 2008; Potkin et al 2009; Royer et al 2009; Tan et al 2005; van Raalten et al 2008; see also meta-analysis by Minzenberg et al 2009). However, while the patients' recruitment of additional areas in our study may represent a behaviourally successful compensatory mechanism, it is also neurally inefficient as it requires additional resources in order to achieve a comparable performance levels as the controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Bearing in mind that the patients have psychotic symptoms and general clinical impairments, this pattern suggests the operation of compensatory neural mechanisms that led to overall successful task performance when compared to healthy controls. A number of previous studies have similarly observed compensatory BOLD increases on the background of comparable task performance in schizophrenia patients (Karch et al 2009; Lee et al 2008; Potkin et al 2009; Royer et al 2009; Tan et al 2005; van Raalten et al 2008; see also meta-analysis by Minzenberg et al 2009). However, while the patients' recruitment of additional areas in our study may represent a behaviourally successful compensatory mechanism, it is also neurally inefficient as it requires additional resources in order to achieve a comparable performance levels as the controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Earlier EEG and fMRI studies also revealed hyperfrontality combined with increased parietal activity in patients with first-episode psychosis during working memory tasks. 10,[51][52][53][54] It is thus likely that the early activation of parietal generators in attentional tasks observed in our study may represent a compensatory mechan ism 55 to facilitate the maintenance of executive performances in patients with first-episode psychosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…On the 1-back and 2-back tasks, participants had to press the left button when the letter on the current trial matched the letter 1 or 2 trials back, and had to press the right button for all other letters. The 2-back task has been shown to reliably activate the DLPFC in HC and SZ participants (Haut et al 2010; Royer et al, 2009). In order to specifically measure neural activity related to 2-back working memory demands, we contrasted activity on 2-back working-memory trials with 0-back visual attention trials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%