1984
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9601(84)90635-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bracket formulation for irreversible classical fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
189
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
189
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The Clebsch structure [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] differs from the Euler structure in the following points:…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Clebsch structure [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] differs from the Euler structure in the following points:…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have chosen the state variables (14) because they appear to us as most appropriate. Another possible choice would be, for example, to replace the deformation gradient F with the displacement field.…”
Section: State Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5 of [2]). Kaufman [89], Morrison [90], and Grmela [66] published the first attempts to include dissipation in systems described by bracket formalisms by introducing a dissipation bracket. Grmela and Carreau [1], Grmela [38,91], and Beris and Edwards [2,67,68] used the bracket formalism to formulate the equations of change of polymeric liquids in a unified framework based on introducing the conformation tensor, an expectation value or continuum variable that represents local average values of stretch and orientation of the polymer coils.…”
Section: The Generalized Bracket Approach Of Grmela Beris and Edwardsmentioning
confidence: 99%