2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2008.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brachytherapy in endometrial cancer: Quantification of air gaps around a vaginal cylinder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2008, in this radiotherapy centre, Cameron et al [1] carried out a retrospective study of 25 patients receiving vaginal vault brachytherapy. It was found that 8 out of 25 patients had air gaps .2 mm in the superior 2 cm of vagina [1].…”
Section: Advances In Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2008, in this radiotherapy centre, Cameron et al [1] carried out a retrospective study of 25 patients receiving vaginal vault brachytherapy. It was found that 8 out of 25 patients had air gaps .2 mm in the superior 2 cm of vagina [1].…”
Section: Advances In Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2008, in this radiotherapy centre, Cameron et al [1] carried out a retrospective study of 25 patients receiving vaginal vault brachytherapy. It was found that 8 out of 25 patients had air gaps .2 mm in the superior 2 cm of vagina [1]. An observational study by Richardson et al [2] found 90 air pockets in 150 procedures for a cohort of 25 patients, 80% having one or more air pockets.…”
Section: Advances In Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 One possible cause of vaginal relapse is that the vaginal mucosa does not receive the prescribed dose because of the presence of air gaps. In a study by Cameron et al, 5 18 of 25 (72%) patients had an average of 1 air gap, with a mean average area of the air gap of 0.20 cm 2 (range, 0.02-1.65 cm 2 ). This resulted in a mean average of 0.86% of the vaginal surface being displaced from the surface of the cylinder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, the entire vaginal mucosal dose was not reported. Cameron et al 5 found that the dose at the mucosa over the air gaps received at 0.5 cm was on average 86.7% (range, 54.7-97.3%) of that which it would have received if there was no air gap. However, the dose at 0.5 cm of the whole vaginal mucosa within the target volume was 99.6% (range, 96-100%) of that prescribed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation