2013
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01069-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brachyspira Species and Gastroenteritis in Humans

Abstract: e Brachyspira species have been implicated as a potential cause of gastroenteritis in humans; this is, however, controversial. In 733 gastroenteritis cases and 464 controls, we found 29 samples positive for Brachyspira species (2.3% of cases and 2.6% of controls; P ‫؍‬ 0.77). Brachyspira species were not associated with gastroenteritis in humans.H uman intestinal spirochetosis (HIS) is caused by spirochetes from the genus Brachyspira (1) and is histologically characterized by the apical attachment of these bac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The members of the genus Brachyspira are thought to be pathogenic to pigs, birds, dogs and humans and may be a cause of gastroenteritis, UC, acute diarrhea and IBS [ 62 ]. It is also known that some of these species can colonize the gut of mice; however, it is not known whether this genus has a pathogenic effect in this case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The members of the genus Brachyspira are thought to be pathogenic to pigs, birds, dogs and humans and may be a cause of gastroenteritis, UC, acute diarrhea and IBS [ 62 ]. It is also known that some of these species can colonize the gut of mice; however, it is not known whether this genus has a pathogenic effect in this case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brachyspira spp. are known as intestinal pathogens in pigs and humans (68,69), although recent studies show that Brachyspira spp. are more widespread in the wildlife community than previously thought, including in freshwater (70).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…include commensal strains that contribute to colonization resistance against bacterial pathogens, 44 as well as strains that cause diarrhea or other infections. 45,46 Notably, pathogenic E. coli (e.g., ETEC, STEC) were no more common among treatment relative to control children by the highly sensitive (>90%) and specific (≥99%) qualitative multiplex assay we used, 47 suggesting that the higher relative abundance of Escherichia in the treatment group was not driven by increases in pathogenic E. coli. Overall, the higher relative abundance of several human enterobacteria among treatment children compared to controls suggests that chlorination-mediated impacts on the gut microbiome could support engraftment of commensal strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%