2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2019.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brachiopod distribution through the Jurassic–Cretaceous transition in the western Tethyan pelagic realm: Example from the Bakony Mountains, Hungary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2); the only difference is that the Hungarian specimen has a larger ventral perforation closer to the anterior commissure. Almost all occurrences are reported from the Tithonian-Berriasian, however, the stratigraphic range of the species is much longer (Jarre 1962;Vörös et al 2019). This asymmetric and obviously injured specimen (Fig.…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2); the only difference is that the Hungarian specimen has a larger ventral perforation closer to the anterior commissure. Almost all occurrences are reported from the Tithonian-Berriasian, however, the stratigraphic range of the species is much longer (Jarre 1962;Vörös et al 2019). This asymmetric and obviously injured specimen (Fig.…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The present authors follow the opinion of Lee (2006) regarding the generic assignment for this species. Some authors (Vörös et al 2019(Vörös et al , 2020 consider that this species belong to Antinomia without further reasoning; however, according to Lee (2006Lee ( : 2140, the latter one is a junior synonym for Pygope. Without established reasoning to place this species into Antinomia, we follow Lee (2006).…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2) As a result of the inability to present a tenable Berriasian stage boundary within the Jacobi-Grandis standard ammonite zone interval, as well as the instability of the proposed boundary location over decades and the obvious lack of a significant biological crisis (see GRANIER, ed., 2019a;GRANIER, 2019bGRANIER, , 2019cGRANIER, , 2019dVÖRÖS et al, 2019;ÉNAY, 2020;SALAZAR et al, 2020), one should definitely close the chapter of its candidacy as the Jurassic/Cretaceous system boundary opened by KILIAN (e.g., 1910) almost a century ago. It would be obtuse to keep on looking for a system boundary where one can hardly identify a stage boundary.…”
Section: See § "Remarks On Biomagnetostratigraphy"mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the framework of a comprehensive project the present author had the possibility to study a large brachiopod material from the Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous formations of the Bakony Mountains (Hungary); the results were published in separate volumes (Vörös 2022a(Vörös , 2022b. The brachiopod fauna (1816 specimens, 32 species) was predominated by Pygopidae (1272 specimens).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%