2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brachial plexus injury following subclavian vein catheterization: a case report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, similarly to recent series, we observed a decreasing trend for early complications. Rare major complication as described in previous studies or case series reports, such as hemothorax [19], air embolism [20], pericardial tamponade [21] and brachial plexus injury [22] did not occur in our series. At the beginning of our experience, the surgical cutdown technique in cephalic vein was used and it had the advantage of no early complications but at the price of a higher technical failure rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Furthermore, similarly to recent series, we observed a decreasing trend for early complications. Rare major complication as described in previous studies or case series reports, such as hemothorax [19], air embolism [20], pericardial tamponade [21] and brachial plexus injury [22] did not occur in our series. At the beginning of our experience, the surgical cutdown technique in cephalic vein was used and it had the advantage of no early complications but at the price of a higher technical failure rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In addition, the overall complication rate was 14.5% (14 patients), consistent with that reported by several studies (range 2–14.4%) [16-19]. Rare major complications, such as hemothorax [20], air embolism [21], pericardial tamponade [22], and brachial plexus injury [23] did not occur in the present series. In addition, the plus-85 and sub-85 groups did not significantly differ in the rates of major complications, catheter-related infections, hematoma, pneumothorax, occlusion, and removal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…[8][9][10][11] Brachial plexus injury can result from compression (by an aneurysm or tumor) or from direct plexus puncture and application of local anesthesia or mechanical injury. [12] Iatrogenic brachial plexus neuropathy has been reported rarely as a result of central venous cannulation (less than 10 cases reported), and consequently, there is not enough experience in the treatment of this type of lesion using endovascular procedure. [9] However, application of covered endovascular endoprostheses in the subclavian artery has been more widely accepted as a reliable minimally invasive modality to exclude arteriovenous fistulas and aneurysms, facilitating a reduction in hospitalization time and blood loss and avoiding the need for general anesthesia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%