“…Twenty-three of the articles (38 studies) were of moderate quality, [19][20][21][22][23][24][29][30][31]33,37,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] nine articles (18 studies) were of good quality [25][26][27][28]32,34,36,51,52 and no article was classified as excellent quality (Supplemental material 2). Fifteen of the 32 articles reported multiple follow-up assessments or different study coho rts, [19][20][21][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]34,39,40,50 resulting in a total of 56 different studies. Data from 35 studies could be pooled in the meta-analysis and data from the 21 remaining studies were included in the ...…”