2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/370107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BPI-ANCA and Long-Term Prognosis among 46 Adult CF Patients: A Prospective 10-Year Follow-Up Study

Abstract: Introduction. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies specific for bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI-ANCA) are frequent in CF patients and mainly develop in response to infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. It is not known to what extent BPI-ANCA correlates to prognosis. Objectives. To evaluate the prognostic value of IgA-BPI-ANCA, measured at the beginning of the study, for transplantation-free survival. Methods. A cohort of 46 adult, nontransplanted CF patients was generated, 1995–1998, and c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BPI-ANCA had a higher capability of predicting these end-points (AUC = 0.77, p = 0.002) compared with serology tests: AUC for AP 0.7 P ( p = 0.02), ELA 0.65 ( p = 0.09), and ExoA 0.54 ( p = 0.6). This finding is in line with earlier results from our group [ 24 ], where BPI-ANCA level, in contrast to Leeds class, was significantly correlated with outcome. These findings suggest that BPI-ANCA is a biomarker of an unfavourable host-pathogen interaction and not merely a substitute marker for P. aeruginosa colonization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…BPI-ANCA had a higher capability of predicting these end-points (AUC = 0.77, p = 0.002) compared with serology tests: AUC for AP 0.7 P ( p = 0.02), ELA 0.65 ( p = 0.09), and ExoA 0.54 ( p = 0.6). This finding is in line with earlier results from our group [ 24 ], where BPI-ANCA level, in contrast to Leeds class, was significantly correlated with outcome. These findings suggest that BPI-ANCA is a biomarker of an unfavourable host-pathogen interaction and not merely a substitute marker for P. aeruginosa colonization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…BPI-ANCA seems to develop in response to P. aeruginosa colonization, but there are also patients colonized with P. aeruginosa who do not develop BPI-ANCA [ 22 , 24 ]. After eradication of P. aeruginosa colonization by lung transplantation a significant decrease in BPI-ANCA levels has been seen [ 22 ] and it has been shown that BPI-ANCA levels significantly decrease after sinus surgery [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study detected TNF‐α, IL‐6, IL‐1β, CRP, and NEU% levels in COPD patients with P aeruginosa colonization and found that inflammatory markers were higher in patients seropositive for BPI‐ANCA than those negative, indicating a link between BPI‐ANCA positivity and inflammatory status in COPD patients with P aeruginosa colonization. A 10‐year study followed 46 patients with cystic fibrosis and P aeruginosa colonization drawn conclusion basically consistent with us—it showed that 15/28 BPI‐ANCA(+) patients developed adverse outcomes ( P = 0.01), while only 2/18 BPI‐ANCA(−) patients did so, suggesting the close association of inflammation and poor prognosis in COPD patients with P aeruginosa colonization with serum BPI‐ANCA positivity. Besides, pulmonary function test showed that indices including FEV 1 %pred and FEV 1 /FVC (%) decreased significantly in COPD patients with P aeruginosa colonization positive for BPI‐ANCA, which is basically consistent with the findings of Seema Singh et al…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Levels of BPI-ANCA correlate strongly with markers of lung disease and it may indicate a pathogenic role in CF [121] and a recent study has shown that the presence of BPI-ANCA correlated significantly with a poor outcome, being death or requiring a lung transplantation. Furthermore, in patients colonised with PA the outcome was significantly worse if associated with this biomarker [122].…”
Section: Serum Biomarkers As Markers Of Systemic Inflammationmentioning
confidence: 95%