2012 Fifth IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/soca.2012.6449467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BPEL conformance in open source engines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If all runtimes available support all of the language elements available in the same manner with respect to semantics, then any compilable program will be portable to any runtime and there are no portability issues. Language runtimes for Java come close to this property, but for BPEL and serviceoriented process languages in general, the situation is rather different, as demonstrated in recent benchmarks [10]. There, each runtime typically supports a specific language subset, as outlined in Fig.…”
Section: Measuring Portabilitymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…If all runtimes available support all of the language elements available in the same manner with respect to semantics, then any compilable program will be portable to any runtime and there are no portability issues. Language runtimes for Java come close to this property, but for BPEL and serviceoriented process languages in general, the situation is rather different, as demonstrated in recent benchmarks [10]. There, each runtime typically supports a specific language subset, as outlined in Fig.…”
Section: Measuring Portabilitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In [10], even the top three engines in terms of successful conformance tests share only 45 % of the total test set. This implies that engines implement relatively disjoint sets of the language (cf.…”
Section: Empirical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations