2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24584-3_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Box-Counting Fractal Dimension Algorithm Variations on Retina Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the analysis of human retinal vessels, it has been reported that a healthy eye has an FD of around 1.7 (Family, Masters, & Platt, 1989;Mainster, 1990;Popovic et al, 2018). However, it has also been shown that, due to its underlying dependence on the structural properties of the image, the FD is sensitive to a number of other factors from both biological origin e.g., age, cataracts, and lens opacity (Cheung et al, 2012), changes in blood pressure due different origins (Sng et al, 2010;Zhu et al, 2014), existing diabetic condition , and cognitive dysfunctions (Taylor et al, 2015), as well as numerical origin e.g., size and location of the region of interest Huang et al, 2015) or the specific stages in the pre-processing procedure (Che Azemin et al, 2016). Due to this overall 'instability' of the FD, which can be significant in some cases, one should not rely a quantitative analysis for diagnosis purposes solely on the value of the FD (Huang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the analysis of human retinal vessels, it has been reported that a healthy eye has an FD of around 1.7 (Family, Masters, & Platt, 1989;Mainster, 1990;Popovic et al, 2018). However, it has also been shown that, due to its underlying dependence on the structural properties of the image, the FD is sensitive to a number of other factors from both biological origin e.g., age, cataracts, and lens opacity (Cheung et al, 2012), changes in blood pressure due different origins (Sng et al, 2010;Zhu et al, 2014), existing diabetic condition , and cognitive dysfunctions (Taylor et al, 2015), as well as numerical origin e.g., size and location of the region of interest Huang et al, 2015) or the specific stages in the pre-processing procedure (Che Azemin et al, 2016). Due to this overall 'instability' of the FD, which can be significant in some cases, one should not rely a quantitative analysis for diagnosis purposes solely on the value of the FD (Huang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second step involves the enumeration of the number of boxes (N) that overlap the matter. Estimation of the FD value can then be calculated from the slope of log Number (N) against log box-size (s) [32]. An example of 3D box-counting analysis is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Box-counting Fractal Dimension (Fd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equation system provides five equations for five parameters, so d i , the vertical scaling factor, is computed by using the fractal dimension (DF) calculated by the box-counting algorithm [54,55]. We can solve the above equations for a i ,c i , d i ,e i ,F i which are defined as…”
Section: Affine Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%