2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.87.241201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bowing of the defect formation energy in semiconductor alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…25,26 The lack of a plasmon resonance indicates a significantly smaller free carrier density compared to phosphorus-doped Si NCs. This difference in phosphorus and boron incorporation efficiency has been shown by various computational models, [27][28][29] in which the lower active boron concentration in Si NCs was attributed to the larger formation energy of boron compared to phosphorus in Si NCs. Accordingly, the boron atoms prefer to reside on or near the surface of the Si NC where they do not affect the free carrier concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…25,26 The lack of a plasmon resonance indicates a significantly smaller free carrier density compared to phosphorus-doped Si NCs. This difference in phosphorus and boron incorporation efficiency has been shown by various computational models, [27][28][29] in which the lower active boron concentration in Si NCs was attributed to the larger formation energy of boron compared to phosphorus in Si NCs. Accordingly, the boron atoms prefer to reside on or near the surface of the Si NC where they do not affect the free carrier concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Consequently, a Cu’ Cd defect in CdTe puts a strain on the lattice. A change in the lattice constant of the host lattice, as is shown here for CdTe 1-x Se x , can therefore reduce the strain that is induced by such a dopant, and can have an impact on the formation energy of the dopant defect, which in turn influences the solubility of the dopant [11]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With Se having the same number of valence electrons as Te, substitution of the two does not introduce dopant-like acceptor or donor defects, but it can influence the behaviour of dopants such as Cu. The formation energy of dopants can be changed in the ternary or quaternary alloy compared to the pure binary compound due to electronic and strain effects: For the CdTe 1-x S x system Ma and Wei predicted a bowing in the formation energy of the Cu’ Cd defect, which causes an increased solubility of the defect in the alloy compared to the pure binary constituents [11]. Other effects of alloying are changes in the lattice constant, in the band gap, in the band alignment and in the solubility of dopants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies suggested different DX configurations of Si in Al x Ga 1-x As to be related to different numbers of Al atoms surrounding the isolated Si donor [40][41][42]. In addition, the negative charge state of a DX center and the positively charged donor were theoretically suggested to form a complex (denoted DDX) at high doping concentration via Coulomb interaction [43]. In that case, the DDX center is more stable than the single DX center and its formation increases further self-compensation effect.…”
Section: Concepts Of the Negative-u And DX Centersmentioning
confidence: 99%