1989
DOI: 10.1177/089686088900900119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bowel Perforation with Unused Tenckhoff Catheters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This complication is not extremely rare but, when we consider the large number of patients undergoing renal transplantation, the reported rate of this complication is small and cannot be used to justify routine removal of catheters at the time of transplantation. Intermittent catheter flushing has been recommended, however, to avoid erosion of the catheter tip into the bowel (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This complication is not extremely rare but, when we consider the large number of patients undergoing renal transplantation, the reported rate of this complication is small and cannot be used to justify routine removal of catheters at the time of transplantation. Intermittent catheter flushing has been recommended, however, to avoid erosion of the catheter tip into the bowel (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, complications have been reported with prolonged embedding of PD catheters (3,4). In particular, bowel perforation has been noted (5,6), but no reports of uterine perforation have been published.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%