2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bovine tuberculosis surveillance alternatives in Belgium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was particularly significant in the case of slaughterhouse inspection, since a very large range of values of inspection sensitivity has been estimated in different contexts, from 0.1 to 0.65 (Asseged et al, 2004;Fischer et al, 2005;Smith et al, 2013;Welby et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This was particularly significant in the case of slaughterhouse inspection, since a very large range of values of inspection sensitivity has been estimated in different contexts, from 0.1 to 0.65 (Asseged et al, 2004;Fischer et al, 2005;Smith et al, 2013;Welby et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, on-farm test sensitivity can be substantially smaller than in controlled laboratory experiment trials as other factors than the imperfect nature of the test may affect test outcome, such as the training level, care and experience of the veterinarian and the actual protocol used. Therefore, following Welby et al (2012), we simulated the uncertainty in test sensitivities by randomly drawing sensitivity values from a beta distribution with mean 0.60 and coefficient of variation 0.10. Analogously to Barlow et al (1997), we assumed a reduction of test sensitivity in infective but not infectious animals (mean value 0.54).…”
Section: Assessment Of the Surveillance Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The suitability of slaughterhouse surveillance for bTB has recently been compared with other surveillance components in Belgium, which is an OTF country (Welby et al, 2012). The authors analysed four different active surveillance components for bTB in a stochastic scenario tree simulation model.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the simulations and the results of the external validation model, it was concluded that surveillance by MI provides the best sensitivity for Belgium. The large sampling coverage was considered an important factor in explaining the high sensitivity of this component (Welby et al, 2012).…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%