2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2010.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bovine tuberculosis: Effect of the tuberculin skin test on in vitro interferon gamma responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
51
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous published reports on the effect of tuberculin skin testing on in vitro IFN-␥ responses are contradictory (13), highlighting the potential influence of several factors, including the nature of M. bovis infection (e.g., natural versus experimental infection), the route of skin test administration (e.g., caudal fold of the tail versus the neck region), blood storage (e.g., 8 versus 24 h), the diagnostic reagents used in either the skin test or the IFN-␥ test (e.g., tuberculin versus defined antigens), and the readout used to evaluate responses (e.g., measurement of IFN-␥ levels per se versus scoring of test-positive/negative responses). In our study, M. bovis-infected animals showed significant increases in both PPDA-and PPDB-induced IFN-␥ levels 1 week after SICCT skin testing, suggesting that antigens present in the tuberculin reagents used in the skin test were reactivating mycobacterium-specific T cells primed earlier following infection with M. bovis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Previous published reports on the effect of tuberculin skin testing on in vitro IFN-␥ responses are contradictory (13), highlighting the potential influence of several factors, including the nature of M. bovis infection (e.g., natural versus experimental infection), the route of skin test administration (e.g., caudal fold of the tail versus the neck region), blood storage (e.g., 8 versus 24 h), the diagnostic reagents used in either the skin test or the IFN-␥ test (e.g., tuberculin versus defined antigens), and the readout used to evaluate responses (e.g., measurement of IFN-␥ levels per se versus scoring of test-positive/negative responses). In our study, M. bovis-infected animals showed significant increases in both PPDA-and PPDB-induced IFN-␥ levels 1 week after SICCT skin testing, suggesting that antigens present in the tuberculin reagents used in the skin test were reactivating mycobacterium-specific T cells primed earlier following infection with M. bovis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The low sensitivity (ca. ϳ56%) of TST is a concern in controlling bTB, and the impact of the risk factor based on TST results might have been incorrectly extrapolated (53). However, if TST Ϫ cattle are infectious and there are susceptible animals in contact, the neglected animals constitute a real problem (54).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This zoonotic infection has a significant economic impact and serious implications for human health, especially in developing countries [1]. Most bTB control programs rely on the intradermal tuberculin skin test (TST) to identify infected cattle, which are then culled [2]. In Taiwan, a national bTB eradication programcomprising an annual TST, restriction of animal movement and slaughter of reactor animals-has been implemented since 1947.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%