2009
DOI: 10.1017/s0967199409005449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bovine sperm cells viability during incubation with or without exogenous DNA

Abstract: SummaryThe aim of this study was to assess the effect of exogenous DNA and incubation time on the viability of bovine sperm. Sperm were incubated at a concentration of 5 x 106/ml with or without plasmid pEYFP-NUC. Fluorescent probes, propidium iodide/Hoechst 33342, FITC-PSA and JC-1, were used to assess plasma membrane integrity (PMI), acrosome membrane integrity (AMI) and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) respectively at 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 h of incubation. Exogenous DNA addition did not affect sperm viabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using flow cytometry, our results showed that incubation with exogenous DNA induced a slightly negative effect on sperm viability. In contrast, recently Feitosa et al (2009) did not report any DNA effect regarding viability using microscopy examination. The negative effect regarding motility and viability, which was higher after a long incubation time, could partially explain the frequent failure of IVF and AI with exogenous DNA reported by some authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using flow cytometry, our results showed that incubation with exogenous DNA induced a slightly negative effect on sperm viability. In contrast, recently Feitosa et al (2009) did not report any DNA effect regarding viability using microscopy examination. The negative effect regarding motility and viability, which was higher after a long incubation time, could partially explain the frequent failure of IVF and AI with exogenous DNA reported by some authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A putative negative effect of DNA binding on motility could explain the failure of SMGT reported by numerous authors. Previous studies reported opposing results regarding a DNA effect: one group of works described a negative effect of the exogenous DNA on the motility of bovine spermatozoa (Schellander et al, 1995; Anzar and Buhr, 2006; Feitosa et al, 2009), while others did not report any effect (Rieth et al, 2000; Alderson et al, 2006). This could be partially explained by the variations between observers during subjective assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a previous work, our group described that incubation period was a factor in decreased sperm viability, causing acrosome membrane disruption during greater incubation periods (Feitosa et al, 2009). This result suggests that not only length of the incubation period, but also CaI concentration is crucial for maintenance of sperm viability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We can speculate that exogenous DNA concentration was not able to trigger endonuclease activity; hence, embryo development rates from all experimental groups were not diff erent (p > 0.05) from control group which suggests that endonuclease activity is not a barrier for SMGT in this species. Feitosa et al (2009), reported that incubation time could reduce sperm viability causing acrosome membrane disruption during increased incubation periods. Our data is in accordance with Canovas, Gutierrez-Adan and Gadea (2010) that showed that aft er 5 min of incubation, more than 20% of bovine spermatozoa bind to exogenous DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%