1982
DOI: 10.1086/202866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bovine Sex and Species Ratios in India [and Comments and Reply]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They posit that as human density increases, draught animal density increases only up to a threshold; thereafter, draught animals are discarded and cows are retained. Thus, both Vaidyanathan et al (1982) and McIntire et al (1992) suggest that milkorientation or HER of a district should increase with increase in population density, once it crosses a threshold level. Since most districts in India have relatively high population densities, we would expect a positive correlation between HER and population density and negative correlation between bovine and work animal density and density of the (human) population.…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They posit that as human density increases, draught animal density increases only up to a threshold; thereafter, draught animals are discarded and cows are retained. Thus, both Vaidyanathan et al (1982) and McIntire et al (1992) suggest that milkorientation or HER of a district should increase with increase in population density, once it crosses a threshold level. Since most districts in India have relatively high population densities, we would expect a positive correlation between HER and population density and negative correlation between bovine and work animal density and density of the (human) population.…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Accordingly, HER is expected to be higher when dairying is practised as a commercial activity. Vaidyanathan et al (1982) argue that bovine male-female ratio is density dependent in India. They posit that as human density increases, draught animal density increases only up to a threshold; thereafter, draught animals are discarded and cows are retained.…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…His ideas, or at least his interpretation of various aspects of India's cattle complex, received some support, mainly from economists and those working in the field of development. [70][71][72][73][74] However, anthropologists and others criticized Harris' position on theoretical grounds. 56,[75][76][77][78] Some scholars, such as anthropologists Stanley and Ruth Freed, presented field data from India as evidence that Harris' technoenvironmental determinism was flawed, arguing that ''emotion, belief and attitude profoundly influence human behavior.''…”
Section: Emergence Of the Sacred-cow Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Indian cattle census reveals a 200: 100 ratio favoring oxen:cows where male traction animals are needed. This ratio varies across India depending upon availibility of feed and upon availability of alternative traction animals (Vaidyanathan, Nair, & Harris, 1982). The ratio drops to 67:100 where traction needs are low and food is scarce (Cultural Materialism, p. 38).…”
Section: Structure and Superstructure As A Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%