2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bovine Host Genetic Variation Influences Rumen Microbial Methane Production with Best Selection Criterion for Low Methane Emitting and Efficiently Feed Converting Hosts Based on Metagenomic Gene Abundance

Abstract: Methane produced by methanogenic archaea in ruminants contributes significantly to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. The host genetic link controlling microbial methane production is unknown and appropriate genetic selection strategies are not developed. We used sire progeny group differences to estimate the host genetic influence on rumen microbial methane production in a factorial experiment consisting of crossbred breed types and diets. Rumen metagenomic profiling was undertaken to investigate links b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
321
2
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(348 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
18
321
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Effects are seen most clearly when the difference in MeP between groups of animals is large; for example, Wallace et al (2015) used treatments that generated a 1.9-fold difference in CH 4 emissions. Roehe et al (2016) observed that the ranking of sire groups for CH 4 emissions measured with respiration chambers was the same as that for ranking on archaea:bacteria ratio, providing further evidence that host control of archaeal abundance contributes to genetic variation in CH 4 emissions, at least in some circumstances. Across a wide geographical range, the methanogenic archaea were shown to be highly conserved across the world .…”
Section: Rumen Function Metabolites and Microbiomementioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Effects are seen most clearly when the difference in MeP between groups of animals is large; for example, Wallace et al (2015) used treatments that generated a 1.9-fold difference in CH 4 emissions. Roehe et al (2016) observed that the ranking of sire groups for CH 4 emissions measured with respiration chambers was the same as that for ranking on archaea:bacteria ratio, providing further evidence that host control of archaeal abundance contributes to genetic variation in CH 4 emissions, at least in some circumstances. Across a wide geographical range, the methanogenic archaea were shown to be highly conserved across the world .…”
Section: Rumen Function Metabolites and Microbiomementioning
confidence: 60%
“…One clear limitation of metagenomic predictions compared with genomic predictions is that the microbiome of the host is variable; that is, it may change in response to diet or other environmental factors over time, whereas the host's DNA remains constant. Roehe et al (2016) also conducted rumen metagenomic analysis from 8 beef cattle divergent for CH 4 emissions and demonstrated that 20 microbial genes (out of 3,970 identified) were significantly related to CH 4 emissions. These included genes involved in the first and last steps of methanogenesis: formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase subunit B (fmdB) and methyl-coenzyme M reductase α subunit (mcrA), which were 170 times more abundant in high-emitting cattle.…”
Section: Rumen Function Metabolites and Microbiomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies across mammal species (Hackstein and van Alen, 1996) and within bovine lines (Roehe et al, 2016) have also suggested that host genetics influence levels of methanogens. Methanogen carriage has been associated with leanness and with a better metabolic profile in obese humans (Le Chatelier et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these studies have generated informative single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), their current utility for selection programs is limited as causative SNP because RFI appear to be breed or population specific (Saatchi et al, 2014). More recent studies (Jami et al, 2014;McCann et al, 2014b;Myer et al, 2015;Roehe et al, 2016) have highlighted interrelationships that exist between host animals with divergent phenotypes for feed efficiency and their rumen microbiome structure. These recent advances in microbiomics, as well as metabolomics (metabolite profiles; Karisa et al, 2014), will drive discovery of more informative genomic markers for more accurate and robust selection for RFI across divergent cattle populations.…”
Section: Selection Strategies For Efficient Meat Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%