2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(02)01170-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bovine and buffalo in vitro embryo production using oocytes derived from abattoir ovaries or collected by transvaginal follicle aspiration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
58
3
12

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
58
3
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast with these results the earlier studies by Neglia et al (2003) yielded blastocyst rate of 19.9% in control group. The discrepancies in the blastocyst yield may be attributed to the quality of oocytes obtained from abattoir and culture conditions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…In contrast with these results the earlier studies by Neglia et al (2003) yielded blastocyst rate of 19.9% in control group. The discrepancies in the blastocyst yield may be attributed to the quality of oocytes obtained from abattoir and culture conditions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…The higher number of COC recruited per donor in bovine vs buffalo results from the different follicular population of the two species. It was also observed, confirming previous findings (Neglia et al, 2003), that the percentage of good quality oocytes is higher in bovine compared to buffalo. However, it is worth pointing out that the average number of COC/donor recorded in buffalo in the present trial is higher than usually reported in literature (Gasparrini, 2002).…”
Section: Materials and Methods -supporting
confidence: 91%
“…This land mark achievement led to production of a large number of buffalo embryos and pregnancies from abattoir-derived ovaries, but the success rate was low (Gasparrini 2002;De Rosa et al 2005;Madan 2005;Hufana-Duran et al 2007). In comparison to cattle, buffaloes show a similar maturation rate (94 vs 87 %, respectively), but a significantly lower cleavage rate (84 vs 65 %, respectively) (Gasparrini 2002;Neglia et al 2003). Also, the blastocyst rate of buffalo is poor (20 %) compared to cattle (35-48 %) (Liang et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%