2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.crma.2016.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bourgain–Brézis–Mironescu formula for magnetic operators

Abstract: Abstract. We prove a Bourgain-Brezis-Mironescu type formula for a class of nonlocal magnetic spaces, which builds a bridge between a fractional magnetic operator recently introduced and the classical theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Roughly speaking, these spaces are the natural functional setting in electromagnetism when dealing with particles interacting with a magnetic field. We refer to [44] for the analogous of (1) when p = 2, and to [42] for the general case and for magnetic BV functions. We finally refer to [37,38] for similar results for more general nonlocal functionals akin to those considered in [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roughly speaking, these spaces are the natural functional setting in electromagnetism when dealing with particles interacting with a magnetic field. We refer to [44] for the analogous of (1) when p = 2, and to [42] for the general case and for magnetic BV functions. We finally refer to [37,38] for similar results for more general nonlocal functionals akin to those considered in [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper was motivated by some works concerning the magnetic Schrödinger equation false(uiAfalse)2u+Vfalse(xfalse)u=ffalse(x,false|ufalse|false)u, which have appeared in recent years (see other works) and have extensively studied , when the above magnetic (uiA)2u=Δu+2iA(x)·u+|A(x)false|2u+iudivA(x). As stated in Squassina and Volzone, up to correcting the operator by the factor (1− s ), it follows that false(normalΔfalse)Asu converges to −(∇ u − iA ) 2 u as s →1.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, up to normalization, the nonlocal case can be seen as an approximation of the local one. The motivation for its introduction was described in the literature and relies essentially on the Lévy‐Khintchine formula for the generator of a general Lévy process. If the magnetic field A ≡0, the operator false(normalΔfalse)Aεs can be reduced to the fractional Laplacian operator (−Δ) s , which may be viewed as the infinitesimal generator of a L trueé́vy stable diffusion processes .…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) In [32] it was proved that, in the singular limit for α ր 1, the operator (1 − α)ε 2α (−∆) α Aε converges, in a suitable sense, to the classical local magnetic operator (1.4). Whence, up to multiplication by 1 − α the nonlocal theory is somehow consistent with the classical one.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motivations for its introduction are described in [13,32] in more detail and rely essentially on the Lévy-Khintchine formula for the generator of a general Lévy process. If the magnetic field A ≡ 0, it seems that the first work which considered the existence of solutions for problem (1.1) in the subcritical case with ε = 1, formally α = 1 and K = 0 was [16].…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%