2015
DOI: 10.1177/1741143214559229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bourdieu’s distinction between rules and strategies and secondary principal practice

Abstract: This paper reviews a selection of literature on secondary principal practice from which to propose an approach for further research. The review demonstrates that applications of Bourdieu’s theory of practice have contributed to understandings about secondary principal practice, and that the distinction he made between rules and strategies has the potential to provide a useful approach to gaining new understandings of everyday secondary principal practice. The paper signals that it is timely to undertake resear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretically, this article is inspired by Bourdieu's work (Bourdieu, 1997Bourdieu & Wacquant, 1996; and, in particular, his concept of habitus, which must always be understood in relation to his concepts of field and capital (economic, cultural, social, and symbolic). Furthermore, we are inspired by recent applications of this perspective to studies of organizations and leadership (Anderson, 2016;Eacott, 2011;Emirbayer & Johnson, 2008;Mcginity & Gunter, 2016;Swartz, 2008). We use this research programme to conceptualise how school leaders may construct a leader identity as a negotiation between prior dispositions (as teachers, middle managers, students, children, etc.)…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, this article is inspired by Bourdieu's work (Bourdieu, 1997Bourdieu & Wacquant, 1996; and, in particular, his concept of habitus, which must always be understood in relation to his concepts of field and capital (economic, cultural, social, and symbolic). Furthermore, we are inspired by recent applications of this perspective to studies of organizations and leadership (Anderson, 2016;Eacott, 2011;Emirbayer & Johnson, 2008;Mcginity & Gunter, 2016;Swartz, 2008). We use this research programme to conceptualise how school leaders may construct a leader identity as a negotiation between prior dispositions (as teachers, middle managers, students, children, etc.)…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second dimension, respecting school regulations, and teachers' and students' rights, emphasises the fact that school rules are designed to safeguard the human rights and dignity of all students and all teachers; therefore, principals are well aware of the importance of conforming to these rules (Norberg and Johansson, 2014). As conflicts occur, principals are expected to seek ways to resolve the discrepancies between teachers' and students' beliefs and school regulations and guidelines (Anderson, 2016;Murphy and Louis, 2018).…”
Section: Educational Leadership and Ethical Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender is one of the main factors influencing the difficulties perceived and the motivations held by potential candidates to principalship, which is reflected in the traditional underrepresentation of women in principalship positions (Carrasco, 2004;Smith, 2011). Female principals confront negative evaluations and stereotypes about their leadership abilities that can hinder their leadership practices (Andersen 2016;Murakami and Törnsen, 2017). This does not mean, however, that female principals are at a disadvantage compared to male principals for performing any of the tasks involved in school leadership.…”
Section: Personal and Contextual Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%