2011
DOI: 10.1080/13537903.2011.616033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bourdieu, Capital, and Conflict in a Religious Field: The Case of the ‘Homosexuality’ Conflict in the Anglican Communion

Abstract: Although Bourdieu's sociological project is a generalised sociology of religion, his work has not been as influential among sociologists of religion as one might have expected it to be. In this paper we provide an overview of Bourdieu's analysis of religion, paying particular attention to key problems that have been identified in the literature, and suggesting how his work can be understood in such a way as to overcome these limitations. Drawing upon research by two of the authors of this current paper, we sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
24

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
26
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…His theories on religion have been little-utilised in relation to social class (Rey 2008). This lacuna may have developed because it is not necessarily sociologists who have appropriated Bourdieu's writings on religion (McKinnon and Trzebiatowska 2011). Meanwhile class scholarship rarely references religion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His theories on religion have been little-utilised in relation to social class (Rey 2008). This lacuna may have developed because it is not necessarily sociologists who have appropriated Bourdieu's writings on religion (McKinnon and Trzebiatowska 2011). Meanwhile class scholarship rarely references religion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of research inspired by Bourdieu has focused on inequality, and in some of this work the notion of ‘field’ is used in the general sense of ‘social field’ rather than with particular attention to the differentiation of spheres associated with modern societies. This has been especially prominent in British sociology, where research on organizations and professions is relatively less central to sociology than in the US or Germany, for example (but see, e.g., Couldry ; Thompson ; McKinnon, Trzebiakowska and Brittain ). There is a tension among Bourdieu's own studies of fields, some of which are primarily concerned to show how positions in fields relate to class positions of origin (e.g., Bourdieu and de Saint‐Martin ) and others focus more on intra‐professional distinctions (e.g., Bourdieu ).…”
Section: Why Not To Formalize Dimensions Of Field‐variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, he emphasized the necessity of empirical research in determining the existence and the boundaries of any specific field in any given time and place (Bourdieu and Wacquant 1992, 100-101). In this vein, Bourdieu's theorizations on religion have been used to successfully identify local religious fields and capital, and to analyze religious specialists' strategies for accumulating power and position, in various geographical and historical contexts (Fer 2010;Ladwig 2011;Maduro 2005;McKinnon, Trzebiatowska, and Brittain 2011;Rey 1998;Urban 2003). Several recent studies inquire specifically into the organization of the religious field under conditions of heightened pluralism (Wood 2007;Wood and Bunn 2009).…”
Section: The Religious Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%