2017
DOI: 10.32917/hmj/1499392824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounds on Walsh coefficients by dyadic difference and a new Koksma-Hlawka type inequality for Quasi-Monte Carlo integration

Abstract: In this paper we give a new Koksma-Hlawka type inequality for Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) integration. QMC integration of a function f : [0, 1) s → R by a finite point set P ⊂ [0, 1) s is the approximation of the integralWe treat a certain class of point sets P called digital nets. A Koksma-Hlawka type inequality is an inequality bounding the integration error Err(f ; P) := I(f ) − IP(f ) by a bound of the form |Err(f ; P)| ≤ C · f · D(P). We can obtain a Koksma-Hlawka type inequality by estimating bounds on |f (k… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One straightforward idea is to construct infinite order digital nets and sequences and then study their propagation rule. In this line of research, we refer to [62,67] for the Walsh analysis of infinitely many times differentiable functions, and furthermore, to [44,59,60,61,13,43] for the relevant literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One straightforward idea is to construct infinite order digital nets and sequences and then study their propagation rule. In this line of research, we refer to [62,67] for the Walsh analysis of infinitely many times differentiable functions, and furthermore, to [44,59,60,61,13,43] for the relevant literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first assertion on the decay of the Walsh coefficients was shown in [3], while the second assertion of the sparsity of the Walsh coefficients was shown in [38]. Regarding the first assertion, we also refer to more recent works [62,67] which introduce different approaches from the one by Dick [7,8,9] for evaluating the Walsh coefficients. In many cases, one may obtain smaller constants C α,b .…”
Section: Optimal Order L 2 -Discrepancy Boundsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, for simplicity, here we take q = r = ∞ and denote the corresponding norm by The following theorem is adjusted from [23, Theorem 3.10] for b = 2. We made use of a new result in [107] that a constant C α,b which usually appears is exactly 1 when b = 2. Furthermore, we followed the proof of [84, Theorem 5.1] to obtain the factor 2/n instead of 2/(n − 1).…”
Section: Weighted Space Of Smooth Functions Over [0 1] S and Interlamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(computations with C = 1 yielded different generating vectors, and led to slight artefacts on high levels L ≥ 7 in this example). For the presently used base b = 2, the choice C = 1.0 holds [29].…”
Section: Affine-parametric Linear Test Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%