2017 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/isit.2017.8007111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounds on the rate and minimum distance of codes with availability

Abstract: In this paper we investigate bounds on rate and minimum distance of codes with t availability. We present bounds on minimum distance of a code with t availability that are tighter than existing bounds. For bounds on rate of a code with t availability, we restrict ourselves to a sub-class of codes with t availability called codes with strict t availability and derive a tighter rate bound. Codes with strict t availability can be defined as the null space of an (m × n) parity-check matrix H, where each row has we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above bound (27), derived in [111], is tighter than (26) as r increases for any fixed t. An upper bound on rate of an (n, k, r = 2, t) SA-LR code over F 2 that for large t, becomes tighter in comparison with the bounds in either (26) or (27), is presented in [144]. Also contained in [144], is an upper bound on the rate of an (n, k, r, 3) SA-LR code over F 2 which is tighter than the bound in either (27) or (26) for r > 72 and which makes use of the "transpose"-based rate equation appearing in [111].…”
Section: Parallel-recovery Lr Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above bound (27), derived in [111], is tighter than (26) as r increases for any fixed t. An upper bound on rate of an (n, k, r = 2, t) SA-LR code over F 2 that for large t, becomes tighter in comparison with the bounds in either (26) or (27), is presented in [144]. Also contained in [144], is an upper bound on the rate of an (n, k, r, 3) SA-LR code over F 2 which is tighter than the bound in either (27) or (26) for r > 72 and which makes use of the "transpose"-based rate equation appearing in [111].…”
Section: Parallel-recovery Lr Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regenerating codes were proposed to decrease repair bandwidth of distributed storage systems by accessing more nodes and downloading less data from each node [1,2]. Locally repairable codes [3] improve the repairability of distributed storage system by decreasing number of nodes connected in the repair process. In a locally repairable code with strict (r, t)-availability [3], each symbol in a codeword is protected by t disjoint recovering sets of size r (r is locality of the code, t is availability of the code).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locally repairable codes [3] improve the repairability of distributed storage system by decreasing number of nodes connected in the repair process. In a locally repairable code with strict (r, t)-availability [3], each symbol in a codeword is protected by t disjoint recovering sets of size r (r is locality of the code, t is availability of the code). (n, k, r, t) q denotes [n, k] locally repairable codes with (r, t)-availability over F q .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations