2006
DOI: 10.11650/twjm/1500404576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounds on the Number of Vertex Independent Sets in a Graph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors have studied the number of independent sets in graphs arising from various families (see, for example, [11,12,14,18]). The parameter i(G) is sometimes called the Fibonacci number of a graph [15], since i(P n ) = F (n + 2), where P n is the path with n vertices and F (m) is the mth Fibonacci number. We note in passing that i(G) is the evaluation of the independence polynomial of G at the value 1; see [6,7,8] for more on the independence polynomial.…”
Section: Independence Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have studied the number of independent sets in graphs arising from various families (see, for example, [11,12,14,18]). The parameter i(G) is sometimes called the Fibonacci number of a graph [15], since i(P n ) = F (n + 2), where P n is the path with n vertices and F (m) is the mth Fibonacci number. We note in passing that i(G) is the evaluation of the independence polynomial of G at the value 1; see [6,7,8] for more on the independence polynomial.…”
Section: Independence Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the minimum for a given stability number is somewhat easier to obtain and given in [86]: apart from the vertices that form the largest independent set, all vertices are mutually connected in the extremal graph. A very similar problem results if one fixes the size of a maximum matching; Yu and Tian [118] consider this in even more generality: in addition to the order n of the graph and its edge-independence number m (i.e., the size of a maximum matching), the cyclomatic number t is fixed (this is equivalent to prescribing the number of edges, which is equal to n + t − 1).…”
Section: General Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a result by Pedersen and Vestergaard [86] deserves to be mentioned: if the girth r and the maximum distance h of a vertex from the unique cycle are fixed, the maximum of the Merrifield-Simmons index is attained for a graph that results from attaching n − r − h single edges as well as a path of length h to one of the vertices of a cycle C r .…”
Section: Merrifield-simmons Index) On the Other Hand The Maximum Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Zykov was actually considering cliques in a graph with given clique number, but by complementation this is equivalent to considering independent sets in a graph with given independence number.) Other articles addressing questions of this kind include [9], [11], [14] and [16].Having resolved the question of maximizing i(G) for G in a particular family, it is natural to ask which graph maximizes i t (G), the number of independent sets of size t in G, for each possible t. For many families, it turns out that the graph which maximizes i(G) also maximizes i t (G) for all t. Wingard [17] showed this for trees, Zykov [19] showed this for graphs with a given independence number (see [4] for a short proof), and Cutler and Radcliffe [4] showed this for graphs on a fixed number of edges (again, as a corollary of Kruskal-Katona). In [10], Kahn conjectured that for all 2d|n and all t, no n-vertex, d-regular graph admits more independent sets of size t than the disjoint union of…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%