1991
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620320503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounds on eigenvalues of finite element systems

Abstract: Bounds on eigenvalues of various finite element systems are analysed by using an element eigenvalue theorem together with the Global Eigenvalue Theorem. Both two dimensional continuum dynamics and heat conduction problems are considered. These bounds provide stable time steps for explict time integration schemes. A reduced eigenproblem at element quadrature point level, with all zero eigenvalues suppressed, is also presented in this paper. The simplified eigenproblem results in simple formulas for calculating … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where K = 1, 2, … , N E , and the projector P 0 (⋅, ⋅) is defined in (28). On using (36) and ( 28), we can rewrite (38) as…”
Section: Element Mass Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where K = 1, 2, … , N E , and the projector P 0 (⋅, ⋅) is defined in (28). On using (36) and ( 28), we can rewrite (38) as…”
Section: Element Mass Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to such an element as a polyhedral virtual element. The elastodynamic eigenproblem on each element is solved, and the element eigenvalue inequality [26][27][28] is used to obtain a lower bound estimate of the critical time step. Comparisons of the critical time step on a suite of bad-quality tetrahedral FEs are made with a polyhedral virtual element to assess the performance of the VEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the calculation of the maximum eigenvalue for a large system is computationally expensive, the critical time step can be approximated using the maximum eigenvalue of a local system . Because the maximum eigenvalue of a local system is greater than the maximum eigenvalue of a global system, an approximated critical time step ( normalΔttrue˜cr) is given as normalΔttrue˜cr=2max()ωmaxE<normalΔtcr,0.75em where ωmaxE is the maximum eigenvalue of an element.…”
Section: Time Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, there are two interesting exceptions to the general observation that most researchers focus on the element eigenvalue problem. Firstly, Lin suggested to use the eigenvalue problem at the integration point level, rather than the element level. The presented bounds on the respective eigenvalues demonstrate that this approach is safe but conservative: the critical time step computed using the integration point eigenvalues is around 15% lower than the critical time step computed using the elemental eigenvalues for the tests reported in and around 30% lower than the global maximum eigenvalue for the tests reported in .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, Lin suggested to use the eigenvalue problem at the integration point level, rather than the element level. The presented bounds on the respective eigenvalues demonstrate that this approach is safe but conservative: the critical time step computed using the integration point eigenvalues is around 15% lower than the critical time step computed using the elemental eigenvalues for the tests reported in and around 30% lower than the global maximum eigenvalue for the tests reported in . Alternatively, some researchers aim to solve the global eigenvalue problem, using for instance power iteration methods or Lanczos methods .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%