2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcs.2016.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounds and Fixed-Parameter Algorithms for Weighted Improper Coloring

Abstract: We study the weighted improper coloring problem, a generalization of defective coloring. We present some hardness results and in particular we show that weighted improper coloring is not fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by pathwidth. We generalize bounds for defective coloring to weighted improper coloring and give a bound for weighted improper coloring in terms of the sum of edge weights. Finally we give fixed-parameter algorithms for weighted improper coloring both when parameterized by treewidth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has led to the study of the problem on Unit Disk Graphs Havet et al (2009) as well as various classes of grids Araújo et al (2012); Bermond et al (2010); Archetti et al (2015). Weighted generalizations have also been considered Bang-Jensen and Halldórsson (2015); Gudmundsson et al (2016). More background can be found in the survey by Frick (1993) or Kang's PhD thesis (Kang (2008)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to the study of the problem on Unit Disk Graphs Havet et al (2009) as well as various classes of grids Araújo et al (2012); Bermond et al (2010); Archetti et al (2015). Weighted generalizations have also been considered Bang-Jensen and Halldórsson (2015); Gudmundsson et al (2016). More background can be found in the survey by Frick (1993) or Kang's PhD thesis (Kang (2008)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to the concept of relaxed (or improper, or defective) coloring of a graph. Please refer to [1,3,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%