1991
DOI: 10.1016/0166-218x(91)90067-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounding the number of k-faces in arrangements of hyperplanes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(This is given in terms of hyperplane arrangements and oriented matroids in Fukuda, Tamura & Tokuyama [214,213].) 7.19 For any vector configuration V = {v 1 , .…”
Section: 18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(This is given in terms of hyperplane arrangements and oriented matroids in Fukuda, Tamura & Tokuyama [214,213].) 7.19 For any vector configuration V = {v 1 , .…”
Section: 18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, in the GSMM of B.cuenoti , every single FT has more EFMs than the whole network has FTs. This is in contrast to general hyperplane arrangements, in which there are least as many topes (sign vectors with maximal support) as vertices (sign vectors with minimal support) (Fukuda et al , 1991). We conjecture that the lower number of FTs compared to EFMs is a typical feature of GSMMs; a detailed comparison will be the scope of further work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For results concerning inequalities and unimodality of the f -vector of zonotopes, see [17,18,19]. The minimal and maximal number of connected components of arrangements has been studied by Shnurnikov [30] in the cases of Euclidean, projective and Lobachevskiȋ spaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%